Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:98153 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 5759 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2017 23:22:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 3 Feb 2017 23:22:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=yohgaki@ohgaki.net; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=yohgaki@ohgaki.net; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain ohgaki.net designates 180.42.98.130 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: yohgaki@ohgaki.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 180.42.98.130 ns1.es-i.jp Received: from [180.42.98.130] ([180.42.98.130:47870] helo=es-i.jp) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 50/D9-38491-81015985 for ; Fri, 03 Feb 2017 18:19:53 -0500 Received: (qmail 41312 invoked by uid 89); 3 Feb 2017 23:19:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail-qt0-f175.google.com) (yohgaki@ohgaki.net@209.85.216.175) by 0 with ESMTPA; 3 Feb 2017 23:19:49 -0000 Received: by mail-qt0-f175.google.com with SMTP id k15so59764948qtg.3 for ; Fri, 03 Feb 2017 15:19:48 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJ6x+mxm29YM+bMiyAc/gYaIcI6AJOqkluOeYEj0bvUMyFHq1ifDLah3m7sGAcYkqH4gOplkNlbCgM/Pg== X-Received: by 10.55.75.143 with SMTP id y137mr15258714qka.39.1486163982962; Fri, 03 Feb 2017 15:19:42 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.19.232 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 15:19:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2017 08:19:02 +0900 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: To: Scott Arciszewski Cc: PHP Internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114a8a5c4863270547a88415 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [VOTE] Libsodium as a core extension in PHP 7.2 From: yohgaki@ohgaki.net (Yasuo Ohgaki) --001a114a8a5c4863270547a88415 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Scott and all, On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 5:44 AM, Scott Arciszewski wrote: > I've opened the vote for the libsodium RFC. > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/libsodium > > See https://externals.io/thread/626 for the previous discussion topics. > > The vote closes at 21:00 UTC (4 PM Eastern Time) next Friday. > I voted for "No, sodium_foo" syntax in order to be consistent with existing procedural APIs. 2/3 majority wouldn't fit nicely. What it would be if vote result is 51% vs 49%? More than half is good enough for 2nd vote choice. IMO. Regards, -- Yasuo Ohgaki yohgaki@ohgaki.net --001a114a8a5c4863270547a88415--