Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:97935 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 49213 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2017 10:52:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Jan 2017 10:52:33 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=mail@tomsommer.dk; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=mail@tomsommer.dk; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain tomsommer.dk designates 94.231.106.220 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: mail@tomsommer.dk X-Host-Fingerprint: 94.231.106.220 asmtp.unoeuro.com Received: from [94.231.106.220] ([94.231.106.220:48958] helo=asmtp.unoeuro.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id BB/BE-00729-F60E5885 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 05:52:32 -0500 Received: from webmail.unoeuro.com (webmail.unoeuro.com [94.231.108.230]) by asmtp.unoeuro.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 72D65C0303; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 11:52:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from [94.231.96.5] by webmail.unoeuro.com with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Mon, 23 Jan 2017 11:52:26 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 11:52:26 +0100 To: Maciej Sobaczewski Cc: PHP internals , Maciej Sobaczewski In-Reply-To: <9b34a688-49ad-ad0c-50e5-8baa0b52045f@php.net> References: <9b34a688-49ad-ad0c-50e5-8baa0b52045f@php.net> Message-ID: X-Sender: mail@tomsommer.dk User-Agent: UnoEuro Webmail Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Redesign of bugs.php.net From: mail@tomsommer.dk (Tom Sommer) On 2017-01-23 08:22, Maciej Sobaczewski wrote: > What are your thoughts? Does it look good? Can I start the branch or > you prefer something entirely different/leaving it as-is? The "button-links" move the layout when you hover over them, because of the style-change to italic, very annoying for the eye. Would it not make sense to just make these clickable buttons? Or at least underline them to show they are clickable? Not very friendly at the moment. // Tom