Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:97934
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain fedoraproject.org from 217.70.183.196 cause and error)
To: internals@lists.php.net
References: <CACXBjuhUphs7uZwFCn+18_DLC=Dcyg_TTyJRS7dLFfjNmP5f2Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEKnhAHtXJp7UY49moWbJN+0VOeYaxCs_erf4=X4Od4yz4Mh3Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACXBjujSC4kwv1otKPkm7eA0yTh+HkQRr3GFPFmXCHdhnyhYsg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1c18a6eb-452a-9d9a-b9ef-8f19a44f7dae@fedoraproject.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 11:48:25 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CACXBjujSC4kwv1otKPkm7eA0yTh+HkQRr3GFPFmXCHdhnyhYsg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="AcI1wgHXD0DxFx0jhIijFjkd99a00aqPC"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 7.0 and openssl 1.1
From: remi@fedoraproject.org (Remi Collet)

--AcI1wgHXD0DxFx0jhIijFjkd99a00aqPC
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="7EUHXJWGrL3mglV80klvxRj1H994oWGuo";
 protected-headers="v1"
From: Remi Collet <remi@fedoraproject.org>
To: internals@lists.php.net
Message-ID: <1c18a6eb-452a-9d9a-b9ef-8f19a44f7dae@fedoraproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 7.0 and openssl 1.1
References: <CACXBjuhUphs7uZwFCn+18_DLC=Dcyg_TTyJRS7dLFfjNmP5f2Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEKnhAHtXJp7UY49moWbJN+0VOeYaxCs_erf4=X4Od4yz4Mh3Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACXBjujSC4kwv1otKPkm7eA0yTh+HkQRr3GFPFmXCHdhnyhYsg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACXBjujSC4kwv1otKPkm7eA0yTh+HkQRr3GFPFmXCHdhnyhYsg@mail.gmail.com>

--7EUHXJWGrL3mglV80klvxRj1H994oWGuo
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Le 23/01/2017 =C3=A0 04:24, Rasmus Lerdorf a =C3=A9crit :
> Ok, I thought perhaps the changes for just openssl-1.1 api compatibilit=
y
> would be easier to separate out, but I guess not. I did have a look at =
it
> and you are right, while some of the changes are trivial, others are mo=
re
> involved. Fedora 26, and I would guess any Linux distro release that co=
mes
> out this year, will ship with openssl-1.1 so they will not be able to r=
un
> any version of PHP prior to 7.1.

Fedora 26 will have openssl 1.1 and PHP 7.1.

BTW, still a good idea to be able to build previous versions.

Fedora also have a compat-openssl10 (version 1.0.2j for now) which allow
to build not-compatible applications.

But as said by Rasmus, there is tons of extensions and libraries linked
against openssl, and having both versions loaded in the same process can
only be a huge mess, and raise terrible issues.

IIRC, debian even have a patch for this.
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-php/php.git/tree/debian/patches/0048-M=
erge-OpenSSL-1.1.0-support-from-PHP-7.1-branch.patch


Remi



--7EUHXJWGrL3mglV80klvxRj1H994oWGuo--

--AcI1wgHXD0DxFx0jhIijFjkd99a00aqPC
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAliF33kACgkQYUppBSnxahgFPQCfVPrZ0+9zw495pRYR2Deiv5wW
Y8UAnAt5GRJbMMYP0P2QNY3AKayy1j/g
=ctUT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--AcI1wgHXD0DxFx0jhIijFjkd99a00aqPC--