Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:97877
Return-Path: <leight@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 20351 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2017 14:15:02 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 19 Jan 2017 14:15:02 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=leight@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=leight@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.215.46 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: leight@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.215.46 mail-lf0-f46.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.215.46] ([209.85.215.46:36454] helo=mail-lf0-f46.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id A3/75-00729-5E9C0885 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 09:15:02 -0500
Received: by mail-lf0-f46.google.com with SMTP id z134so37409073lff.3
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 06:15:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :cc;
        bh=pN9nR4QKxrPz1l3YeZ5DRe01evuBlnTtdj26TerP+Q8=;
        b=lLyxDQP5ZNQE4IhLR3tQfWZqMuOq8M/4rX7b4I5/YDCJOE8n5oSzatOczlKsvD+tBn
         7jPXfY9HncWSWtWMSLj2InGLPfhK/KzwY13tnkj3gupaDVwwkhlnl4ZrYNw1LOyYRQmI
         aC5qFAUkxD2Fyi1oV7xzJZOmapt/P+uxNxbGeuGZzEviQj+/L/SfcxkjmeALVjyY0+uq
         amChUh4FZqn4vKJ1dxLfRupnYthX1ODYmWJ3ERjfRsZuKM4GSKYPcAJRuYtnVLH8TsZc
         7hVn489kv3Nu/+7ej+bNhl1Dchz8uyFTMdZTI6QSkWXjNKSLFDgZpEn94wneUS1EJyCW
         l8MA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:cc;
        bh=pN9nR4QKxrPz1l3YeZ5DRe01evuBlnTtdj26TerP+Q8=;
        b=pfD0dQOS6vg8VZ7JKymiXDPCsf+l5aGyUJXB+Euue2JfBDTLf0Rt2Uz/owX9XgYUq9
         10wnMrs4XYAuzj1johiPOZcT0+YOzpayaOoyEngENLAJZk8sDq9DpZv4sue6hkPMNlHv
         ZjL4NJ0xx0XCw0C4otDjEQDLVmFG71xdQSi4HSF37tQmBTjrybR81xKQdRLbs/akZ0cY
         zj1ubKMgsOD9XBTcH8RjWYLcszJ6hSJKZU/6DTGzlyYZjEpQDaEgS/dJBaicFh6wgLUl
         48FpiZrOOjpTtcvSaHUNgDuDxIRay6DOsxSX8SwLvW3mDM8ccsa4lL9HOMJIOb1Gxr8w
         rKxA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLmEG95LACNDBSqbkIyoniiGOG+jD9/9I4POECflRprn6dxgYQO84nnqqBT2hP5Xx/+6StqAoiZL+a+dA==
X-Received: by 10.25.15.68 with SMTP id e65mr3238111lfi.117.1484835298931;
 Thu, 19 Jan 2017 06:14:58 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.193.83 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 06:14:57 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAGa2bXbn4d7tT_NG2EHzFKvMDWAr=TCPw1L26QJv7jyKE5of+w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGa2bXbFST=5DkhiJ6zJ1hJ5vZYUo7CnCDp+VXcyvSU-bWcyMg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGa2bXak3tZ+kC6EeiA=ZCeynGSZbO-4Hpd1v_1oZVDHpSAvsA@mail.gmail.com>
 <71c26cd6df6f59e76dafd31647852c2e@koti.fimnet.fi> <CAGa2bXY0djrgpbC_wNGeRyciNygS59hmuaUaZG-=vAt0dZoxxA@mail.gmail.com>
 <142a3537a99809cf23d78e0eaadc3aef@gmail.com> <7a359bb08b0ad8b046534c15492cec91@gmail.com>
 <CAGa2bXZgbsHM-PZcSUoyA8VZ22rmMmjy41tGPUszC2Acr7Zjyw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAF+90c9jC0r22NEPbeYXMgL8F_qm0rtJ-nXTeqj_PgjhcY6RRw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGa2bXaSux=Pq8+9N4wT9gaqjY--N=D9WwH0560=JEUjutd5LA@mail.gmail.com>
 <8cfe7a3ea5a05fc3e5347e9af848ada0@gmail.com> <CAGa2bXZzpfEuQDEcQM=eLRit8BRieW5KY5h-H59+1-P0Ehmomw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPwsocFypb4m7sA0An0CmJ=izZW_07PzyFVN7bN9A+q81aTEvw@mail.gmail.com> <CAGa2bXbn4d7tT_NG2EHzFKvMDWAr=TCPw1L26QJv7jyKE5of+w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 14:14:57 +0000
Message-ID: <CAPwsocHkfvrMAvBrS2v09yHDaiwWrqEVhTy24nY8Wo=r6jnSmA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Yasuo Ohgaki <yohgaki@ohgaki.net>
Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Lauri_Kentt=C3=A4?= <lauri.kentta@gmail.com>, 
	Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com>, "internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Improving mt_rand() seed
From: leight@gmail.com (Leigh)

On 19 January 2017 at 11:46, Yasuo Ohgaki <yohgaki@ohgaki.net> wrote:
> How many of us are willing to allow very weak mt_rand fallback?
> This could be RFC vote option, if there are few.

Everyone who cares about stability.

I agree, if you want to introduce breaking changes, this needs to go to RFC.

Therefore the simplest option seems to be DON'T introduce breaking
changes. Wouldn't you agree?