Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:97834
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.53 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <9DBA4F2C-F8D5-4B2F-B211-F9C2A4664AB7@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="Apple-Mail=_DD9C51DE-7EFB-4A5D-8AF1-4C9926759BF8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 22:11:24 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CAOsHV+tyRUKBJ4o+jwK=jm9hYgNokpY4BePuGSY4nNb5_cKtsg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
To: Marcio Almada <marcio.web2@gmail.com>
References: <C098D88D-32D3-4489-B1FA-C49527B28979@gmail.com>
 <CAOsHV+tyRUKBJ4o+jwK=jm9hYgNokpY4BePuGSY4nNb5_cKtsg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][DISCUSSION] - Disallow Multiple Constructor Calls
From: tim.bezhashvyly@gmail.com (Tim Bezhashvyly)

--Apple-Mail=_DD9C51DE-7EFB-4A5D-8AF1-4C9926759BF8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8

Hi Marcio,

there is no deprecation because nothing is deprecated. This is a =
behavioural constrain.

Regarding parent() this is just one possible future RFC. Our intention =
was just to depict that the RFC in hand opens such possibilities. There =
is no obligation.

Regards,
Tim

> On 17 Jan 2017, at 22:08, Marcio Almada <marcio.web2@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> Hi Tim,
>=20
> I'm ok with the idea. But could you elaborate why not propose a =
deprecation before the error on PHP 8?
>=20
> Also, one point about the future scope "Add shorthand parent() as =
alternative to parent::__construct().":
> Do we really need to introduce more language constructs that look like =
valid user space code https://3v4l.org/CE2q8 <https://3v4l.org/CE2q8> ?
>=20
> Thanks.
> M=C3=A1rcio.
>=20
> 2017-01-17 16:17 GMT-04:00 Tim Bezhashvyly <tim.bezhashvyly@gmail.com =
<mailto:tim.bezhashvyly@gmail.com>>:
> Dear internals,
>=20
> me and Richard Fussenegger came up with a RFC draft disallowing =
multiple constructor calls - =
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/disallow-multiple-constructor-calls =
<https://wiki.php.net/rfc/disallow-multiple-constructor-calls> =
<https://wiki.php.net/rfc/disallow-multiple-constructor-calls =
<https://wiki.php.net/rfc/disallow-multiple-constructor-calls>>
>=20
> Here is a Reddit discussion thread - =
https://www.reddit.com/r/PHP/comments/5okdac/php_rfc_disallow_multiple_con=
structor_calls/ =
<https://www.reddit.com/r/PHP/comments/5okdac/php_rfc_disallow_multiple_co=
nstructor_calls/> =
<https://www.reddit.com/r/PHP/comments/5okdac/php_rfc_disallow_multiple_co=
nstructor_calls/ =
<https://www.reddit.com/r/PHP/comments/5okdac/php_rfc_disallow_multiple_co=
nstructor_calls/>>
>=20
> Any suggestions are highly welcome. Thank you.
>=20
> Regards,
> Tim
>=20
> =20
>=20


--Apple-Mail=_DD9C51DE-7EFB-4A5D-8AF1-4C9926759BF8--