Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:97778 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 80941 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2017 08:50:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Jan 2017 08:50:12 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=michal@brzuchalski.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=michal@brzuchalski.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain brzuchalski.com designates 188.165.245.118 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: michal@brzuchalski.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 188.165.245.118 ns220893.ip-188-165-245.eu Received: from [188.165.245.118] ([188.165.245.118:38482] helo=poczta.brzuchalski.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 9E/55-00729-A398C785 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 03:50:05 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by poczta.brzuchalski.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FB7E2984236 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 09:49:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from poczta.brzuchalski.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (poczta.brzuchalski.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P1vl6zmTlKlC for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 09:49:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-vk0-f44.google.com (unknown [209.85.213.44]) by poczta.brzuchalski.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D4D222984233 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 09:49:52 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-vk0-f44.google.com with SMTP id r136so69194206vke.1 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 00:49:52 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLqKpyMjB/cPetPuwcnnNEIlC4YmU04fcR+6ZSzvj9WqvEoBC58e7uIVY/rGCcg741vGxP0Gs4itgvVKw== X-Received: by 10.31.157.21 with SMTP id g21mr15588769vke.91.1484556591926; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 00:49:51 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.35.204 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 00:49:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 09:49:51 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: To: Marco Pivetta Cc: Wes , PHP Internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1141712a50014905463244d5 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Unsetting declared fields From: michal@brzuchalski.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_Brzuchalski?=) --001a1141712a50014905463244d5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Marco, 2017-01-16 0:27 GMT+01:00 Marco Pivetta : > Hi Wes, > > This has been discussed before, and it's currently used to intercept acce= ss > to properties. Since we don't have property accessors (sigh), the code > (simplified version) would look like following: > > class Foo > { > public $bar =3D 'baz'; > } > > class FooInterceptor extends Foo > { > private $wrapped; > public function __construct(Foo $wrapped) > { > $this->wrapped =3D $wrapped; > unset($this->bar); > } > public function __get(string $name) > { > var_dump('reading ' . $name); > return $this->wrapped->$name; > } > } > > $foo =3D new FooInterceptor(new Foo); > > var_dump($foo->bar); > > You can see a working example at https://3v4l.org/UtugD There is one more thing might be confusing - reflection tells there still exists bar property after unset while it's realy not. For example https://3v4l.org/NAg1l $class =3D new ReflectionClass(FooInterceptor::class); $property =3D $class->getProperty('bar'); var_dump($property); // still exists while actually being unset may cause errors I'm sticking to extending class without magic _get method implemented. > > > This behavior is protected from regressions since PHP 5.4, but has been > working since 5.0: > https://github.com/php/php-src/blob/cd2b462a2742c79256668d4736644e > 34573c33d9/tests/classes/unset_properties.phpt > > We can most probably get rid of this weird behavior once property accesso= rs > are in the language. > > Greets, > > Marco Pivetta > > http://twitter.com/Ocramius > > http://ocramius.github.com/ > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 12:20 AM, Wes wrote: > > > Hello elephpants. > > > > Currently PHP allows explicitly declared fields (eg public $foo =3D 10;= ) to > > be removed entirely through unset (eg unset($obj->foo)). > > > > Now that isn't really an issue as properties in php are currently untyp= ed > > and therefore nullable; at worst you would get a notice. But it would > > become an issue with typed fields... that might get a second chance > sooner > > or later. > > > > But regardless of that, it looks very strange to me that this is allowe= d > > for fields that are explicitly declared. I think unset() should set the > > field to null if it's declared in the class, and remove the field > > altogether only if it was defined dynamically. > > > > On the other hand, this is just one of many ways of hacking php that ju= st > > exist and we accept / don't care because we have faith in other people > not > > doing nasty stuff with our code. This might sound ironic it is actually > not > > :P > > > > However, I am curious: what you think about this? Should PHP do somethi= ng > > in regard? Should this continue to work like it does now? Why do you fe= el > > it should do the one or the other? > > > --=20 regards / pozdrawiam, -- Micha=C5=82 Brzuchalski about.me/brzuchal brzuchalski.com --001a1141712a50014905463244d5--