Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:97525 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 39291 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2017 14:34:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 6 Jan 2017 14:34:49 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=adam.baratz@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=adambaratz@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.214.47 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: adam.baratz@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.214.47 mail-it0-f47.google.com Received: from [209.85.214.47] ([209.85.214.47:35747] helo=mail-it0-f47.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 16/32-23307-80BAF685 for ; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 09:34:48 -0500 Received: by mail-it0-f47.google.com with SMTP id c20so14016505itb.0 for ; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 06:34:48 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=J+wM/PHwcuVqyZyZmWSQ50EEO//ir8+kafhC7KaShoI=; b=h+uN/aOe/oGv4W6UQEuqHJbeXUeVy0EqjeaHEeXcNg7C44/ap9rqPgFSLFQIEJYe2W xT30jz+Pi2sq4bKS/diA/Ih/juruc1bR4zHQvQd2UUr8LkGevtMJuQzoHk8VJcgkIXS9 LE9s3XmTB2cLtzqO+wemnoV5A+3ol59lbjBk/0XfbtpFSlwQdFMuvZB507NYOLKsearG ecFhwei3DuKyw0wzd/WDED8XCYS99P0TtdIVHZ6YhJo6jtKxdYZ1YHWO0Jnv/JKYTFjl kzu91d4ESbXpVrzxH+B5dTG3EwVtAIBqO3DcTleI3jBnA5TUm15moD8sq1P96KFzdSWJ wJDw== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKb5qfRGzaZlUei7cCKibdqxb8v2kB52zZqnaz4P19pqB7H/j6airT82UCH+3arHQ== X-Received: by 10.36.90.144 with SMTP id v138mr2877353ita.24.1483713286070; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 06:34:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-io0-f175.google.com (mail-io0-f175.google.com. [209.85.223.175]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 18sm4694709ioj.44.2017.01.06.06.34.45 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 06 Jan 2017 06:34:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-io0-f175.google.com with SMTP id v96so33547692ioi.0 for ; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 06:34:45 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.107.162.203 with SMTP id l194mr26614143ioe.31.1483713285024; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 06:34:45 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.146.10 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 06:34:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <0D388F9E-98FA-4C1F-95FA-759C4D4731C6@gmail.com> <2A.04.04761.F9A9D585@pb1.pair.com> <2017010414120739532-pmjones88@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 09:34:44 -0500 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: To: Paul Jones Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11408a4e4d75d605456deb47 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] ServerRequest and ServerResponse objects From: adambaratz@php.net (Adam Baratz) --001a11408a4e4d75d605456deb47 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > Today marks two weeks since this RFC was introduced. As I said at the > start, it's the holidays, so I expect to keep the discussion period open > for longer than two weeks, but I am surprised at how little discussion > there has been. The email introducing the RFC missed my inbox somehow. I don't see it in the archive either, even though it's in the newsgroup. I'm wondering if there was a glitch somewhere. I was able to find your blog post introducing the RFC: http://paul-m-jones.com/archives/6494 For anyone else that missed the original message, the post has a link to the original message: http://news.php.net/php.internals/97461 One request: could you update the RFC list[1] so this one is in the "under discussion" section? Makes discovery easier. There's an RFC howto[2] that should cover this. Looking forward to taking a look at this one. This is definitely a topic of interest with the engineers I work with. Thanks, Adam --- [1] https://wiki.php.net/rfc [2] https://wiki.php.net/rfc/howto --001a11408a4e4d75d605456deb47--