Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:97459 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 63854 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2016 19:58:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 Dec 2016 19:58:05 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=mtkocak@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=mtkocak@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.215.48 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: mtkocak@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.215.48 mail-lf0-f48.google.com Received: from [209.85.215.48] ([209.85.215.48:36093] helo=mail-lf0-f48.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 6E/F2-43332-B403C585 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 14:58:05 -0500 Received: by mail-lf0-f48.google.com with SMTP id t196so125829175lff.3 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 11:58:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Zv4cI40kpJyDbJw3T4ATIFXjJHi3+M5/sH0Q6M9n9Nc=; b=GjADUkcqbCpcjzYfoVan45sxlZe4ZG6k+EL2nUUZPCA/68MmH1m9GAPVkUdwOaCX8D Sqlh5hk1K5HioQ4APOhidayC44oRZZGcQiz5UHb40zHyP4yk7pWAZyNaR4vuWGWjqmBI 5Mp0q3l3T6HUM3MxvM75TfIxPUxDjHoD07PAxO5TXXHQcWliszcScFQhRTdmRgAyjM9g 6FP/xzLcxSeYpny76TEraoIMSqMoQ4vdlzMVPM90MVyGHFBAlxf5qTT7F22z935+wJat EO0a+zoyJXVu+zKrDZr1ErCAQkAGu5dNvKQVl1LZp7EGCS2ZOMzNkEdyPWN8btQiFgrJ 4fcw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Zv4cI40kpJyDbJw3T4ATIFXjJHi3+M5/sH0Q6M9n9Nc=; b=FlunR8AZJCCcFZWc/nU0517oQ2WC0HjwJYgqQWsoHTVSPi+EwpoS16kFHuENUy8CEr RfDvwgPGfnDMIn7ZXeirPyxomuQ8PQ6z8Uae59Z3BRHXLrJBLN/cvl4/H1nRUoJ8qigW yHjTUZeYHzmoCa2Mz/1Vpnu1qsxla7igCb1j5O3atz4S92p09MiJU2+ZZCcUG203lu00 42uRWaWXmVfC9zgnowW4cOJ9dkZIyVY4F3jlrsXUElWCfBboxRKpBq81bT2qM/VyA41I ccUcvp/E41dquLbcliR4xB8WgOVd8PVAto26Dhw4+TSmZ3M8G+9ByMDzVzn8siBAOBir /G3Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLxZr/6FlL+w2/ftHBB93kh4VvODDiVl1CY0BQLnbbI+yyi7nGB3vhswov+VuV1gmgSjb9qeRt4vbENpA== X-Received: by 10.25.138.11 with SMTP id m11mr4754127lfd.150.1482436680353; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 11:58:00 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.16.86 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 11:58:00 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 20:58:00 +0100 Message-ID: To: PHP Internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113fbf6abc0c24054444af8a Subject: ??= operator From: mtkocak@gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Midori_Ko=C3=A7ak?=) --001a113fbf6abc0c24054444af8a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Dear internals, Remember ??=, was accepted with 37/4 votes? Since then I did not have time to implement the ??= because I did not have time Hence I am currently unemployed and continuously passing tech interviews and failing non-technical 2. rounds, I have plenty of time, so I decided to going back to implementations. Sometime ago I got ?:= implementation from @saramg, for cheating but I see that it was not implemented due to edge cases. I think I missed some discussion for a while, so I am unaware of the cases. Was there a decision about it? Or should I give up trying to implement this? Thank you very much, Midori P.S: Sorry for English mistakes if there are. --001a113fbf6abc0c24054444af8a--