Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:97189
Return-Path: <netmo.php@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 57578 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2016 19:11:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 25 Nov 2016 19:11:13 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=netmo.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=netmo.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.215.54 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: netmo.php@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.215.54 mail-lf0-f54.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.215.54] ([209.85.215.54:35020] helo=mail-lf0-f54.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 35/6A-21589-0DC88385 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 25 Nov 2016 14:11:13 -0500
Received: by mail-lf0-f54.google.com with SMTP id b14so56550182lfg.2
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 25 Nov 2016 11:11:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:cc;
        bh=gd1SjH5iFXj6biOcXwHOAE0LMmIuu++2MzvMZMuT+mw=;
        b=tuLUkEkNqZsC79nF4uIT3qEpolFbhv91AItcGt72XjVE9cxVQAnE7czh0U5iAWA6eX
         DO8a4G7tMNpGe1tndqPYqQpnmABjG0T+c/A9eYGZyVZ8BvYIQJEa0Z7xlBt55aap/ep5
         Ueyk+d8VMXKlqZI/IBiwIvC83HpzDANxoQ/5PsTrUNC23khqnCYz+2enwqW1Dr7S3z9e
         mg2RjUODO68oyFiY+AXuD1PBH28IXOCKHckxxiY/sTDo0p/QqI4m+mW8FchyLujUSI73
         g3xqFgejpqfV2GBWIf39eCzuuMutEA4YiiA71Oi2Q7scVDzEqYuAKC281iUxMiPMQoBG
         H5+A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:cc;
        bh=gd1SjH5iFXj6biOcXwHOAE0LMmIuu++2MzvMZMuT+mw=;
        b=crgkYaaD7dtRPqne0AONTDTzXPf9K2YZRnr+7Oib4HquPdZ5cfLE/G/x5BSFjbuAg/
         mtQ3hTcETpZt6sFmFK04tuZcoNKgN3Wm1gPeAblJa9xy93BhFPLvbImBz/QglwdYUlxd
         S0l+C0j0u0AGl+brcT7NmAWImODu5g1Z9u1mQLxKldGI476zN+AUn0AjAe6tpoY/+TM6
         xJh7ViuJ3Q21eK01NsTykr+uEczdzTYIFegrRSOph64KEMgWWtksAabZan0P8TgNwP1Z
         OQ8cUMdgmtPAXXFufKt1Kg6OXZmi8jJ93DRgi1la0qevPdzB89kfxLnkFOpEt5j+svTb
         0bCQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC02fKL7r73UujoxwUWG+QI8nA/2CtqRn8x0VnSINfmMgj9BK4hIhniFzvAVOT9Mhl0YHAHcTzSaNXh/WDw==
X-Received: by 10.25.77.133 with SMTP id a127mr3483260lfb.165.1480101068786;
 Fri, 25 Nov 2016 11:11:08 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.114.14.6 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Nov 2016 11:11:08 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <131bb54b-24cf-a93d-b80e-071c92103ae7@gmail.com>
References: <CAOv67guVwwNvbczE3YKkHT6rBynAd-P7kjm89PxcC4uKiWjuqw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOv67gurregNTQfAZ08EqTPoeK+3t_HLdrtfpN-8DsHHkKnnpA@mail.gmail.com> <131bb54b-24cf-a93d-b80e-071c92103ae7@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 20:11:08 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOv67gsYUvpPMVfZCf-TxV8hyjkGXzWnZJ1o1pupsqvkO5=Xuw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1141eeec6fd2ca054224e2fd
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] ArrayIterator improvements
From: netmo.php@gmail.com (Wes)

--001a1141eeec6fd2ca054224e2fd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

2016-11-25 19:27 GMT+01:00 Stanislav Malyshev <smalyshev@gmail.com>:

>
> Now the RFC says " if the given key is present in the array the method
> would successfully return null". While technically in PHP not returning
> value and returning NULL is the same thing, I'd just omit the whole
> return thing altogether to remove temptation of somebody using it.
>

Fixed!

--001a1141eeec6fd2ca054224e2fd--