Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:97161
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain belski.net from 85.214.73.107 cause and error)
To: "'Dennis Clarke'" <dclarke@blastwave.org>,
	<internals@lists.php.net>
References: <06fe01d24646$00d96d30$028c4790$@php.net> <323632ff-5d0d-418d-4c15-2a57e70a7f75@blastwave.org>
In-Reply-To: <323632ff-5d0d-418d-4c15-2a57e70a7f75@blastwave.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 15:33:16 +0100
Message-ID: <073501d2465f$b3ff82f0$1bfe88d0$@belski.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Thread-Index: AQIaxpnNmbkGM2rYq6/2jumrzJl0KQMFmC11oD8C9eA=
Content-Language: en-us
Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP 7.0.14RC1 is available for testing
From: anatol.php@belski.net ("Anatol Belski")

Hi,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dennis Clarke [mailto:dclarke@blastwave.org]
> Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2016 3:09 PM
> To: internals@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 7.0.14RC1 is available for testing
> 
> On 11/24/2016 06:29 AM, Anatol Belski wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > PHP 7.0.14 RC1 was just released and can be downloaded from:
> >
> >
> > Please test it carefully, and report any bugs in the bug system.
> 
>     I am going to drag it kicking and screaming across a strict C99
compiler inside
> a strict POSIX environment and see what happens. This is an important
test. At
> least to me. The portability of this codebase is so critical longterm and
I, perhaps
> alone in this test, really need to know that the code will compile
everywhere
> forever.
> 
> > The stable release is planned for December 8th, if no critical issues
> > will be discovered in the RC.
> >
> 
>      Could just be too much coffee early in the morning but I really want
to to see
> the results of a compile with C99 and _XOPEN_SOURCE=600 defined.  That
> should land us firmly inside SUSv3 world and The Open Group Base
Specifications
> Issue 6 IEEE Std 1003.1, 2004 Edition.
> 
> Dennis Clarke
> 
> ps: the compiler I will be using :
> 
>      n0 $ which c99
>      /opt/developerstudio12.5/bin/c99
>      n0 $ c99 -V
>      c99: Studio 12.5 Sun C 5.14 SunOS_sparc 2016/05/31
> 
You can just enable -std=c99 with gcc, to see it doesn't compile. Some
amount of work might be needed for true C99 compat. I'd suggest you to reply
to the earlier thread "C89 vs. C99" started recently.

Regards

Anatol