Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:97153 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 97407 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2016 08:12:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 24 Nov 2016 08:12:44 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=danack@basereality.com; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=danack@basereality.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain basereality.com from 209.85.161.173 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: danack@basereality.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.161.173 mail-yw0-f173.google.com Received: from [209.85.161.173] ([209.85.161.173:35456] helo=mail-yw0-f173.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 17/D0-21589-CF0A6385 for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2016 03:12:44 -0500 Received: by mail-yw0-f173.google.com with SMTP id i145so33104718ywg.2 for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2016 00:12:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=basereality-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=dpbSZyQF/MINmkz+c/a8wwbR9xkYCxjm8MMkdK8xsSw=; b=iF+IKCoK0WuvW1rylSQFiHNXPa14Wq643UAfS5I6+qWp9BBrATFyFeXDsDugoBHDp7 xkKdr15NpLMuG6TGDs2KSo6qTKENN4Hax8mxjQBrC3qVxm5nKae0YJfXPZ6yDabX/akd H3+dVXqSCstV0VC+B4RwA7HYZ5Y3Otl1r4b4NwzrfOQSzbYgthlWWyop50oGiE2kl3+l qmBEll95itkgYemImL42eHMNzFo07nJVbXt1awIiSSNIkvaBocztK2uwE0F1lTM9tIMQ GgIAFJtUozDt3UGFjWB4vpvoI6jV4pdarRAEdsM0Db/ZjvqJcfCBhqlN+i/IhZYZdusa mlzQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dpbSZyQF/MINmkz+c/a8wwbR9xkYCxjm8MMkdK8xsSw=; b=dpheHyh0pnIpMKd5GmOMz8fWBUDW23Lvcy0PLdUPmcaz0oT54hVsEf0h4ojoOanhTN NrUqcYvdmjuVpgOiqwXx6Q96RZpXu0pb7pDSTXmAZPtGiFnh0ydhG5OFlBq704oym3uf GD0zlyKr+/buFHVl6ZwOSmMrpuzB+DvHw46emKqCsyZAFs8oXQPqUNcIFD23gPGg1h/G mkNB6Wg9Rxc6IKphgaCGyPVY+aGq8CYIj3JfY+chnvShMgaYZjp+nzj392pHZu9v4wam LQ7AW9XBR8MSX0x38GKBy2Ea2VbMc4b5aObCnK0mL3RCzsK/Dmx+y1yzm4kK1fCXpPrj 6SdQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC01vK8MdamMBGfzZvfpG9pNP2je1fJch8uIuS33SkEjkq2iPnrZXFFc6jqNqbdp2IHB6gmdX3XIX98rG7A== X-Received: by 10.129.169.138 with SMTP id g132mr1444955ywh.196.1479975160875; Thu, 24 Nov 2016 00:12:40 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.37.88.193 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Nov 2016 00:12:40 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [77.101.210.160] In-Reply-To: <87d52a15-5fbf-a6fe-fea3-638c24186d99@mabe.berlin> References: <87d52a15-5fbf-a6fe-fea3-638c24186d99@mabe.berlin> Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 08:12:40 +0000 Message-ID: To: Marc Bennewitz Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][DISCUSSION] Object type hint, now with added variance From: danack@basereality.com (Dan Ackroyd) On 23 November 2016 at 11:07, Marc Bennewitz wrote: > > If I declare a return type of "object" and extends that to return "static" > it doesn't compile because "static" is not a valid return type yet. > Hi Marc, That should be part of a separate RFC, that is focused on making static a valid return type. cheers Dan