Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:97139
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain pthreads.org from 209.85.210.171 cause and error)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAOv67gsbn_+aZnWeND0ju8nVbbsBZNZNigffJ99OqPd3Jx=rmg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOv67gt-GD_5rqQyGcMCCfLR3HEy_KnPbD4=Zmk+cMyt8TH9pw@mail.gmail.com>
 <b6bad7b6-fe12-306e-1716-7e824f56f5ba@gmail.com> <CAOv67gt0UXHpxG7c7SOd=XgHs9r2=4rkgBzC-1ic8m6t2bKs0w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOv67gv1a3PaxvEKBvq50U665-2bkg2JoDoXZc3zGGYVyJMrrA@mail.gmail.com>
 <5c579ea1-c8c3-36ec-da94-c479d5156434@gmail.com> <CAOv67gt_ZyFcxqs3OcRfXYUwco1mEmWyCwD=Ky=RruP2EjWfgg@mail.gmail.com>
 <e7b22620-c5f6-d7ee-02f1-fbe2adeeb2b9@gmail.com> <CAOv67gsbn_+aZnWeND0ju8nVbbsBZNZNigffJ99OqPd3Jx=rmg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 05:55:17 +0000
Message-ID: <CAL=_i_=TRrBc4T+y4_MKPftHPkXUKsArK+bXotLd_pyuMeaEuA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Wes <netmo.php@gmail.com>
Cc: Rowan Collins <rowan.collins@gmail.com>, PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013d1a00979bec0541f188b6
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] ArrayIterator improvements
From: pthreads@pthreads.org (Joe Watkins)

--089e013d1a00979bec0541f188b6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Morning Wes,

I'm not sure that you justified the inconsistency in error management.

Why shouldn't it throw InvalidArgumentException ?

Cheers
Joe


On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:26 PM, Wes <netmo.php@gmail.com> wrote:

> Just wanted to save everybody's time. 4 weeks seemed an enormity for that.
> But obviously there is no hurry.
>
> 2016-11-22 21:34 GMT+01:00 Rowan Collins <rowan.collins@gmail.com>:
>
> > On 22/11/2016 17:32, Wes wrote:
> >
> >> Okay. But just for the record, it's about very tiny additions... aren't
> 4
> >> weeks for that too much?
> >>
> >
> > If it's calendar time you're worried about, don't sweat it - the RFC
> > rightly targets 7.2, which won't be released for almost exactly a year.
> So
> > even if we started the vote now, and there was a patch ready by the time
> it
> > closed (there doesn't seem to be one yet?), there'd still be another 50
> > weeks after that before it showed up in a live release.
> >
> > If you pause for 2 weeks of feedback first, it will be released at
> exactly
> > the same time, but have 48 weeks in the code base with nobody using it
> > instead of 50. :)
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > --
> > Rowan Collins
> > [IMSoP]
> >
> >
> > --
> > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> >
> >
>

--089e013d1a00979bec0541f188b6--