Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:97121
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.83.51 as permitted sender)
To: Wes <netmo.php@gmail.com>, PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <CAOv67gt-GD_5rqQyGcMCCfLR3HEy_KnPbD4=Zmk+cMyt8TH9pw@mail.gmail.com>
 <b6bad7b6-fe12-306e-1716-7e824f56f5ba@gmail.com>
 <CAOv67gt0UXHpxG7c7SOd=XgHs9r2=4rkgBzC-1ic8m6t2bKs0w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOv67gv1a3PaxvEKBvq50U665-2bkg2JoDoXZc3zGGYVyJMrrA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5c579ea1-c8c3-36ec-da94-c479d5156434@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 09:30:15 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAOv67gv1a3PaxvEKBvq50U665-2bkg2JoDoXZc3zGGYVyJMrrA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] ArrayIterator improvements
From: smalyshev@gmail.com (Stanislav Malyshev)

Hi!

> I'm not a internals programmer myself but I have consulted some and they
> said proposed features are ok and implementation would be trivial, so I
> thought it was ok to do this. Sorry for that.

If proposed features are so trivial that they do not warrant any
discussion, then there's no need for RFC. Part of RFC process is
inviting people to discuss the changes. That's what it for. Jumping
straight to vote is not how it's supposed to work. I don't know if it
happened in the past - it shouldn't have, but if it did, it was wrong
and should not be repeated.

Minimal discussion period for non-language RFC is one week. Please do
read https://wiki.php.net/rfc/voting before proposing votes. It's the
minimum you could do.

Thanks,
-- 
Stas Malyshev
smalyshev@gmail.com