Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:97077 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 98005 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2016 21:04:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 19 Nov 2016 21:04:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=yohgaki@ohgaki.net; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=yohgaki@ohgaki.net; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain ohgaki.net designates 180.42.98.130 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: yohgaki@ohgaki.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 180.42.98.130 ns1.es-i.jp Received: from [180.42.98.130] ([180.42.98.130:43498] helo=es-i.jp) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 62/10-30930-16EB0385 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 16:04:36 -0500 Received: (qmail 44040 invoked by uid 89); 19 Nov 2016 21:04:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail-wm0-f54.google.com) (yohgaki@ohgaki.net@74.125.82.54) by 0 with ESMTPA; 19 Nov 2016 21:04:30 -0000 Received: by mail-wm0-f54.google.com with SMTP id f82so87107745wmf.1 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 13:04:30 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC00KL9Wc6ncHDH3/G/+1iMSxSDqbzAcSI7F2JRKL0p80Ty7ln2MquMT4aOqqD47BTLfIG4UYsxT0MgV6CQ== X-Received: by 10.28.67.69 with SMTP id q66mr5279877wma.22.1479589463570; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 13:04:23 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.190.200 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 13:03:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 06:03:42 +0900 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: To: Pierre Joye Cc: Joe Watkins , PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Abolish 50%+1 Votes From: yohgaki@ohgaki.net (Yasuo Ohgaki) Hi all, On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 7:45 PM, Pierre Joye wrote: > On Nov 19, 2016 11:34 AM, "Joe Watkins" wrote: >> >> Morning Pierre, >> >> Sorry, but yes. >> >> http://wiki.php.net/rfc/voting >> >> > There'd be a minimum of 2 weeks between when an RFC that touches the > language is brought up on this list and when it's voted on is required. > Other RFCs might use a smaller timeframe, but it should be at least a week. > > Seriously Joe, this is ridiculous. You are forcing a shorter period of time > for something that does affect PHP at a whole. > > Be fair and let anyone raises their feedback. I don't look internal list weeks sometimes. 2 weeks is reasonable period for me, not too long nor too short. I guess a week is too short during holiday season for most people. Regards, -- Yasuo Ohgaki yohgaki@ohgaki.net