Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:96988 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 50767 invoked from network); 18 Nov 2016 12:20:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 18 Nov 2016 12:20:28 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=cmbecker69@gmx.de; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=cmbecker69@gmx.de; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmx.de designates 212.227.15.15 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: cmbecker69@gmx.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.227.15.15 mout.gmx.net Received: from [212.227.15.15] ([212.227.15.15:61595] helo=mout.gmx.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id A5/10-49826-202FE285 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 07:20:27 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.190] ([217.82.239.250]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M3iU5-1cyZgD262z-00rItH; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 13:19:48 +0100 To: Yasuo Ohgaki , Joe Watkins References: Cc: PHP internals Message-ID: <07e69574-790a-9018-38fa-1c9ba9b17d8d@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 13:19:47 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:W1lG/TlVknuNHxvPKbLdrQV492tIZEvINTo03b/KrPXSyMGPxp4 9b4tefNSroxMKR6eCsLRtBvV7P2sxB0BIGiZr+s+VHPtH0QGRW/d/ZMxOhxyzuXahjBUQuz TFdZBYfB3z2jryLzfQRuuHyCAEa5837c86LnsmZXun+cWEloUsXFTeLM3O5UpkFIdepWAk2 +DYYVMgZ4KKWGma/Aj8bg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:Yv18y7jtqPM=:aGbmvxtilNmuNKWHXZoRC5 typw7yAIdfgzDLd4az8j+VBb4oa4pgyltF3h1yRIdSYfrIQJ3Oy1IL7U8YGuJlPCZV1h+J2TL mRQusk0NKSQTTAjxrVAfMfxJr21l7O1qAF+SaVbCbJ0833vDpv1UR21lsqeXLizLeT1XM+NvJ a//pw3q4ZpCRXCaxoLByyKVFcCDDCecPRrhRHAwiE/+cJHAykRsc62NxGNnPEDw+3S8gmc5Dr p+YPUXGbEC+W8u3GWhz+ZowO90xjKsUwpKz8ov2NKkftlBxVQb184HvQT00Avk0dnTR20cLW5 x3Wxjqt9l2UG5bK8TKN1By2W9d44xig+DWynmkySxblRBO3nX3BltfuWEJhZLxt5oUMArz6tS L2cYg27qonjV7+iT8y4/HwdTB1F+6Rrhhro0TMcsPH6A8T4ozJqZWhoazuWx5VbXdH/fI4iio As4LPNpiRfCugSwXwqdF+wsxUMXk5/z/TeWc+3kVNGn6C9kynLIpPSq1eersT3hE77LZte8nb DJweJTC1eUxulYwgnnbtdoZiQv5+jbf5sE8es2L4+yG3PQSYlErCsGMpPE2tkZGiwUBh1mjsZ IDLT4ONlBEtjJFu9aJ/1wTS6KxxgHffezrVL5Avqg2rfAY5B1WKkw/5KjXjT/+ilbInbgOgFt c5p2x1pPuFgEZrWE6zQdwqxiMu+6I4QUqgWNPfbaNgYz1W0OWZIX80FCw+dkpRV+o94/wqIMs H1SP97XIts7YnoHE2lACbQDVK/V/VbA5a1JusNL/OQAVxWD0mAH0mqDfDT6jtMTrcnqd8aNKg k7Wm1w9 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] Abolish 50%+1 Votes From: cmbecker69@gmx.de ("Christoph M. Becker") On 18.11.2016 at 12:05, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote: > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 2:53 AM, Joe Watkins wrote: >> >> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/abolish-narrow-margins > > Requiring 2/3 majority is reasonable. > > I'll vote yes for this if people who are not in favor disclose the > reason why. Just voting "no" for a RFC is not constructive. Improving > a RFC is difficult without reason why it is not preferred. Decision > could be based on wrong assumption and/or misunderstanding sometimes. > > Could we have comment plugin for this? It does not have be to a > comment plugin, if there is better plugin for the purpose. We may consider to customize the doodle plugin[1]. IIRC, it is alread customized and the original is unmaintained, so there won't be update issues. [1] -- Christoph M. Becker