Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:96974 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 87732 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2016 18:46:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 Nov 2016 18:46:20 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pthreads@pthreads.org; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pthreads@pthreads.org; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain pthreads.org from 209.85.214.47 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pthreads@pthreads.org X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.214.47 mail-it0-f47.google.com Received: from [209.85.214.47] ([209.85.214.47:36827] helo=mail-it0-f47.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 13/22-11917-9FAFD285 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 13:46:18 -0500 Received: by mail-it0-f47.google.com with SMTP id l8so156039839iti.1 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 10:46:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pthreads-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=1KLSVynHRYOGEGN4J0OmJEvjaOuud+aizuRuZO5mcqI=; b=ugKxiT5L+8QupkW8anbSuy7Xl4eyH7tvSSlzcJ5LTi4adsbgH+EAku0uq7onxORS7D XfqkRW02ZMcMhlQWTsznyD1EsHjtsGw8Ot82HapfgXMJD1rR9DK3WzuyUO7neSbEBdbb bHdP5M7OyvoxcUH3bJhsvXFpDjogND5oweg2ZTDm5FGpGOsrv/8HoyV79FCm1nlrtKrs Zpz+a38C6WUCSltttJQST28yVsBGGuuiO4PAyIZbzlCV3HmtxMxczHIAhrgZ8Y2PWhhY 8jgVQfSoUpU+NYGknT1KHEA/Kjuu+DpMOYmOf1beZ8Q3E7ey5f+eaCTokEzZbVULqvdH rteg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1KLSVynHRYOGEGN4J0OmJEvjaOuud+aizuRuZO5mcqI=; b=EcM4WosuM7LebtVfRPFaM+9infoglx+COLdvnamasqHZC7DQvjHYBKCOPUQCZOcv3Y M7IGjmkGjFZzU4N9nRyOT+KF7JhzblCUIOahw+Du99fGw+x+2J9jJRRKPbkoCtDr7cpm yXJWpLJ7qvBVSI+rg6t8Ue+XnK7khsA98zxN+arqMti81dVAfbbHX9O0+SljnLiAbSRZ YDTUSGjn61DGyTHZF/IIb4z2rlYrDtbsly82iWkE26pZWl0S+6xpab4eG5aNomIwKYgy tNgd4io0hgt2tLCssnaErRFL/ojSCnK3uMlVDqBChIT8JUS7Uw3ueoBz3PWapjncpBeW 4FJA== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC02j0hglL5oy4Lxt2C0rxrrxXb/uYUj2xjcPuOqQj4pT2yUfQL1lXpoLw503L//10vfjZM7lKa3mEPrLeA== X-Received: by 10.107.19.104 with SMTP id b101mr4479957ioj.150.1479408373186; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 10:46:13 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.79.102.3 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 10:46:12 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [109.157.245.230] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 18:46:12 +0000 Message-ID: To: Niklas Keller Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113f6dd28fde3f0541839a21 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Abolish 50%+1 Votes From: pthreads@pthreads.org (Joe Watkins) --001a113f6dd28fde3f0541839a21 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Afternoon Niklas, I made an off-by-one error in an RFC. Thanks for captioning my pain. Cheers Joe On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 6:43 PM, Niklas Keller wrote: > 2016-11-17 18:18 GMT+01:00 Joe Watkins : > >> Afternoon internals, >> >> This has been discussed before in various RFC threads, there does seem to >> be some consensus that 50%+1 votes could be harmful. >> >> To what degree, I am not sure. >> >> I raise for discussion the topic of abolishing 50%+1 votes, and requiring >> all changes regardless of their nature to pass by a super majority of >> 2/3+1. >> >> Please read the (brief) RFC and raise objections here. >> >> There will be a one week discussion period for this RFC. >> >> Cheers >> Joe >> > > What's the reason for 2/3+1 instead of 2/3? Currently we have 50%+1 or > 2/3, but not 2/3+1 as 2/3 is already a majority. > > Regards, Niklas > --001a113f6dd28fde3f0541839a21--