Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:96962
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain pthreads.org from 209.85.214.53 cause and error)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAL=_i_m79Q3MuvvuhNcxiXF-ARJOW22eGJSoYMZBct6d_xxY3w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL=_i_m79Q3MuvvuhNcxiXF-ARJOW22eGJSoYMZBct6d_xxY3w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 17:53:11 +0000
Message-ID: <CAL=_i_kLzJ0ak6pEPVOGMst1+dmVTZQOwmwUAoi1bi07AqU7DQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114275bceb7b21054182dc1f
Subject: Re: [RFC] Abolish 50%+1 Votes
From: pthreads@pthreads.org (Joe Watkins)

--001a114275bceb7b21054182dc1f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Afternoon internals,

https://wiki.php.net/rfc/abolish-narrow-margins

Cheers
Joe

On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Joe Watkins <pthreads@pthreads.org> wrote:

> Afternoon internals,
>
> This has been discussed before in various RFC threads, there does seem to
> be some consensus that 50%+1 votes could be harmful.
>
> To what degree, I am not sure.
>
> I raise for discussion the topic of abolishing 50%+1 votes, and requiring
> all changes regardless of their nature to pass by  a super majority of
> 2/3+1.
>
> Please read the (brief) RFC and raise objections here.
>
> There will be a one week discussion period for this RFC.
>
> Cheers
> Joe
>

--001a114275bceb7b21054182dc1f--