Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:96960 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 66032 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2016 17:18:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 Nov 2016 17:18:14 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pthreads@pthreads.org; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pthreads@pthreads.org; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain pthreads.org from 209.85.214.50 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pthreads@pthreads.org X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.214.50 mail-it0-f50.google.com Received: from [209.85.214.50] ([209.85.214.50:35990] helo=mail-it0-f50.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 00/33-05303-556ED285 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 12:18:14 -0500 Received: by mail-it0-f50.google.com with SMTP id l8so150745173iti.1 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 09:18:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pthreads-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=zIeFRgq1n/CBQS0/klNT7qqdWAlQz0xpAxrJvE7RUGY=; b=cmN8BZxn9jst6LMXM/Vr4B/KhVAb2j2Z3lHG+WrwKRGxsdtn6tsKoXAbycfeePpZUB fdfZiGEi0rxUXwEA0gYf9qMfaddtCIEL/tdZrm3YVr5D60krk/28ISeJnYFjILzlXNiB gT6wAsEzwAT5gLEcGMAU0TP13PpBtkHI4fA6nws2jXMEJVp+jom9wWSSqMG0eythb9wJ q89qlD2B3Bv3/t0e7C1ig19scd5eK2AFamxM+dEoRxt6Imm2XrWuLknsLl006/suqfDy kOBOJf9ndVE6Uv9MJ9jQyVUjPuKSqUWJ8N2LzZ4m+MUeiqkm7pA6JIBPYjbvydAaWE6k uNjA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=zIeFRgq1n/CBQS0/klNT7qqdWAlQz0xpAxrJvE7RUGY=; b=Wf7H/kyZb/IJSvFdQC59KpHTuj6AXAYLKS9WCLoWvTQRT4H6kk/gfEjI19svYg/GLH 6ubv7rPtR9yWtjQZsj33a6XzuqCN3Qk/E538bAsdE9qGdCNUJ/94AUs3x2Wjsl0ZK6Te h58Kf2pc/4Jz1lvbC2IZce0wcQg/W9WVIrfHll81RCzGHUF93xbwVtCh/A50FgeoMG2e FHam0kl9MqvBRXbp8OyNauiEHtqUIe7Ss2xOJbAPfLQSlZt44fmxffpi/0RSqvdeMmZr ZQaGl1kn7LgV8czflFpJswHpEOHlBzo/jcxJX7HBZZJ53menaiDrnyBAtJchOerOWLJx GEpw== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC00YG7TeOy2kxgmOhqKgTGiD66GR43hVA4FsAv3J2gm2pFuOigcxSReWM1w5UJIWDikpfKjGX4G8zChemg== X-Received: by 10.107.19.104 with SMTP id b101mr3881827ioj.150.1479403090767; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 09:18:10 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.79.102.3 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 09:18:10 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [109.157.245.230] Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 17:18:10 +0000 Message-ID: To: PHP internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113f6dd2b49f270541825f02 Subject: [RFC] Abolish 50%+1 Votes From: pthreads@pthreads.org (Joe Watkins) --001a113f6dd2b49f270541825f02 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Afternoon internals, This has been discussed before in various RFC threads, there does seem to be some consensus that 50%+1 votes could be harmful. To what degree, I am not sure. I raise for discussion the topic of abolishing 50%+1 votes, and requiring all changes regardless of their nature to pass by a super majority of 2/3+1. Please read the (brief) RFC and raise objections here. There will be a one week discussion period for this RFC. Cheers Joe --001a113f6dd2b49f270541825f02--