Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:96940 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 89794 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2016 23:06:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Nov 2016 23:06:40 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=adam.baratz@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=adam.baratz@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.217.180 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: adam.baratz@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.217.180 mail-ua0-f180.google.com Received: from [209.85.217.180] ([209.85.217.180:33037] helo=mail-ua0-f180.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 2D/E8-05303-F76EC285 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 18:06:40 -0500 Received: by mail-ua0-f180.google.com with SMTP id 20so127879407uak.0 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 15:06:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=g3ZxtF7HV0wpi4dxMHhLEyJqr4LuWm5xNNK+hjkOcRw=; b=m2zcuqY1MXawHIzGIvk/3sk+VLHOux2/dkX5U5WwyAIohGXjnfzriQdrpRPI1Mb+H4 TjpEVkFvzWqqGtwAc7tRcOVsAKIW9KzUtniD40WyKjOWm1XBGZSYN0ii2DFFX7Y2b4x3 fXUTfZwnLuKql3N4m2l3L/ye7LIoknPONZNw9jluto/Nmkg63fodJHWbSVgoEerGk9+2 1xLA04RTLo+0z4ikqQArbU+PGVc5AScGtralVe59GJ8fc2aU6k9wzNsDbenOki3kRysq /+ll0G/6JOM3OmIW5ZXLCtFdYDTCXG3I0P9q2QUdpgQkWQ+zlnK/LRjnhj/7oKQUljSL avuQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=g3ZxtF7HV0wpi4dxMHhLEyJqr4LuWm5xNNK+hjkOcRw=; b=bT5vsr1CnZGa1K5qzdBxkguEIp/Ut2BPujdUN8ww6SMxBSKkyQt1mkaRpBLqKzbKoP d0rchgcbLzJ9p2p1WC6jRJQ+M2dytpU1Gwnu+kKXITwugsCwMuvx7PIvJA0Reo9KHY2r lANfIQMrTkKSdYtqYAeHu+HQ6aDWif/hN7GYKzfmRWpBIjfEp3bCQqYNLpnRDr6nSoll cTa42X4vudYxO86UpSTlODSmclScvfC8sOcPBf3sWR/EqhjE44GfiMMQoCGhv1/xG5XT pcSq5M0wXi4qg+/QGAdOsvkwEXXHPvhjLvT5GUcaTaWut/XrOVPeQ7AhWW0/JAuaLOwG PIRA== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvfqZP2LdkiOjfaHAV/AGRik0wat7vGp/5rMmQ//TCAPi/lIF2dEBKTu2NZtVPXCf2tWNSYEssIL3mH9XA== X-Received: by 10.176.83.12 with SMTP id x12mr11225uax.131.1479337597404; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 15:06:37 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.31.137.65 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 15:06:37 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 18:06:37 -0500 Message-ID: To: "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c192438ff0d040541731f70 Subject: [VOTE] Debugging PDO Prepared Statement Emulation From: adam.baratz@gmail.com (Adam Baratz) --94eb2c192438ff0d040541731f70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi, No, you're not misreading the subject line. I began working on the docs for the previously accepted proposal and became uncomfortable with the approach. I think it will be better to integrate this info into PDOStatement::debugDumpParams(). It will let me do the testing I want to do without introducing a new API, which was the primary concern expressed in the previous discussion. I reverted the code I'd committed, updated the RFC with an example, and reset the vote: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/debugging_pdo_prepared_statement_emulation Since this isn't a strong departure from the original RFC, I don't think another discussion period is necessary. Please let me know if you disagree. Otherwise, voting will end on 30 November 2016 at 0:00 UTC. Previous discussion occurred in these threads: http://marc.info/?l=php-internals&m=147638162506291&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=php-internals&m=147734024403899&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=php-internals&m=147673258418764&w=2 Thanks for your patience as I get acclimated to the world of RFCs. Adam --94eb2c192438ff0d040541731f70--