Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:96879 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 21155 invoked from network); 13 Nov 2016 22:12:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 13 Nov 2016 22:12:37 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=cmbecker69@gmx.de; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=cmbecker69@gmx.de; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmx.de designates 212.227.15.19 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: cmbecker69@gmx.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.227.15.19 mout.gmx.net Received: from [212.227.15.19] ([212.227.15.19:50805] helo=mout.gmx.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 81/7A-31581-355E8285 for ; Sun, 13 Nov 2016 17:12:36 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.190] ([79.243.119.150]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MYfX0-1cJiFe2EgU-00VRfW for ; Sun, 13 Nov 2016 23:12:32 +0100 To: PHP Internals References: <9d918ef7-f0eb-80b7-9689-fa6527e3ba68@gmx.de> Message-ID: <3c5d14dc-c94f-aa7e-6322-ba0127b6091a@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 23:12:42 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9d918ef7-f0eb-80b7-9689-fa6527e3ba68@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:5a3D/rJ7GT7vYBLMrI36RWjmwhKYVkfq6lCcmcoZ3hmiCe/eWiv EpSJxdF9tlNBj0ZnwHLx0959YUOL9IYfXvCx97hg6POZEl9szuirig7sBbN84wH3Tx9UQZ2 5v2PNNgzyyKI1+wxY+XbxDpj1CxWEcJJXxmS786/eaZdfNFTdI2QsJB5eyFD4UQnSXDqlrg WGvvhVYTWfOq058E2RO3g== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:UNQ5n23h9Dw=:2niseaBYeM7q1kBQeV1dwH MgkUZt/BMgoeN7wcI9ORecaBQoVuAzyvEAeYdJWD71JjjgAQcvPrvqT2zjfCimb+UaLGoDFY2 wPi/fTtn0C8lV8c+re/QKnX9JdXX6iyXH1suWbTVExyoc0O8tps4Vbgi4tPtMv62Goky6NvZi vDtVhq/gi5o4VLly+wijtElWdNPmTZfRyT/28CHTCcGaouf/3atRUYatoYREdKv5RPSaWbuOV ZAaFGiMGhiau6AVVsabBxeo4C0fRPZBTLlir/c39K0YN3msNVbyg+NkafDZq3vhOT6XcqBJqS GG5I5QaJIoq+i1Ufqy+Ed/zR5ET2rWBstexUwXvy72ZztjyntWoYCSjNpFHaTBAvDP8EWDE2v ukfmv8ir2n4owolGtF0qYqo+Dk+Wi+ihEfETWc78u5XMDwiyM3fpvNDEecolQZ8ODgfAcXh17 kvt2rG7xQOqYF35wQeljm9Q/UqDJG8mfQ98+XoDt2rA4YjnwM1MOV18DLzjYEd5VYerC7fOB+ lz++Zpmpw6MRlM+EcFUZa73XF6sRMpfxNMq09aq+WHjlFYXC8ENCXWzBAkGaHiAdThqH0akCa 9saESWZgB3Vg3itDktTo96ULbB2Id1hmPiYXWJ3NXKbt3oLWly9vbKs/I1mJrYp4SCrfmrqi9 o6WMjuyBmtRK99KDzYP3wsmoXFCd9khudhWzaksUxdv8ayxUNafXVhOzUTGiQ8UKe0Q8PDv/w Eu7Bi+/zYzZkyRFLW76QnwEhi4wunMBYngdjYs+O1S85zzy6UpTWu/NMvzFktFp7spLHSiqsC RBK82vM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Deprecate png2wbmp() and jpeg2wbmp() From: cmbecker69@gmx.de ("Christoph M. Becker") On 30.10.2016 at 22:30, Christoph M. Becker wrote: > As there has been no discussion in the RFC's discussion thread[1], I > assume there is nothing to discuss, so I've just put the "Deprecate > png2wbmp() and jpeg2wbmp()" RFC[2] to voting. The voting period ends on > 2016-11-13, 22:00 UTC. > > Thanks in advance for voting! > > [1] > [2] The RFC has been accepted by 20 votes in favor to none against. Thanks to everyone who participated! I'm going to merge PR #2164 and document the deprecation. Any ideas on how to track the removal of the functions for PHP 8? -- Christoph M. Becker