Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:96863 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 35616 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2016 20:01:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Nov 2016 20:01:59 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=cmbecker69@gmx.de; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=cmbecker69@gmx.de; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmx.de designates 212.227.15.18 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: cmbecker69@gmx.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.227.15.18 mout.gmx.net Received: from [212.227.15.18] ([212.227.15.18:50674] helo=mout.gmx.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id AB/80-31581-53577285 for ; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 15:01:57 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.190] ([79.243.119.150]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Md3li-1cMdPg3s26-00I9k7; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 21:01:43 +0100 To: Dennis Clarke , internals@lists.php.net References: <5ef2496f-e06e-5eff-9547-95021ba0d7f5@blastwave.org> Message-ID: <7250b9e8-d11e-6753-c7d4-deccd85e6280@gmx.de> Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 21:01:48 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5ef2496f-e06e-5eff-9547-95021ba0d7f5@blastwave.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:HzaaddNyTuWf7j8ZO20PCQGgxIITIMdjE+ezupPnhP8CxAQAei1 Rjvkqnkb4ivcNtFYrXnc00wPzf8/P09YQG8yck5YeGKOy6CottXLs7HvFkFJN0NEwqtsPvh y/ZbQBX/zoQ7564JSPpvd+nsu8+ddBaheK0hXmv9qXmsfyn3As/y6CVtC02sSltLfkILD3J bO3BZ+4wZ2LfybTXz/ufA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:L5qgjPwop2U=:Q5zeMGfWFYgZoXS7Ib3XZZ PK7Uz0RF+2hmqopCSTWVJ7gXe9a4ktta1hpa4fMtaS/IV9Um6DaUuqFx8mCxxW64xhMt/EFoy hC5UreyU3Er5/ZWm22SfRKCiMs09epYC+CM4gXPpjBkicZ0Ivnj50zTxn+cuRACAE6M/KuW5t Zs/4A5ZKDpLSALuC0HyHh/2w77s34ReMWseWcSI1fnh3tVFM1lTY0hK9eet7xOItL3uiTkQ7R 5fnEzOzI//VWjnYewQ6Z8eihe/3UrhNkO7v0q0lb0inLF9gRucXsjIanIiV6YQo/sfNrS5JEN egtrSGkKKSyXtmokrPBuq1QKGGj+u4v9P2Offyb5c18TONFywh8pfIXKW5huyceRau4dRFIEo s3Bc10UM79R8WxDM3QhraEmmUXmQoZAEvEgdKSF8Id9m9OerSDjseL+x4vgaOEQgMP8TGSJiT KKHgvWrycc6LIgcUuarj6NcUL9zjxAcHQw2DG4bJuwwuMDECKSKnznkQAj2ZHU9Y1yV73OXSY IxevfGY+q4FCJx1U9SOO6z40PzLChed+xCCs30be5JO5uTKc7pdqf5JxmovTa+sui/1/VMKH3 tjaRRqSXKrsov05Ect8CFgLAmrOyfVU1iUuifaItgu62QNH4bldAkgcBZXVeHvSqDLDgzI5A+ Uv5oXkswWhf48IXIyWdKxHHC5SIz5OYHQk7Z62oNahwFD0xL1azizWo2iPGysZlHmBDMb+ewb +PkMwZsyzf0pEGyBpyOvFyrZCdoC29/fwBFK4ik/dkopL5mBJs5np4B0TBs1pQimydlpxMhE6 H61MMmJ Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: C89 vs. C99 From: cmbecker69@gmx.de ("Christoph M. Becker") On 12.11.2016 at 20:28, Dennis Clarke wrote: > On 11/12/2016 06:27 AM, Christoph M. Becker wrote: > >> On 12.06.2016 at 11:08, Fleshgrinder wrote: >> >>> I am curious why we are not finally doing the switch to C99 with VC14 >>> finally supporting most of C99. I mean, I know that GCC and VC14 do no >>> fully support C99 but the most common features are implemented: >>> >>> - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C99#Implementations >>> - https://gcc.gnu.org/c99status.html >> >> What about other compilers such as Solaris Studio and XL C? > > Oracle Studio compiler tools are fully compliant with C99 and has been > for a very very long time. Thanks for the info! > I would also note that php7.x does not > compile out of the box, yet. However I am looking into why. I remember that there has been an issue with line endings (CRLF) in the generated parsers/scanners, which had been brought up on the general(?) mailing list some time ago. Not sure, if that has been resolved. -- Christoph M. Becker