Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:96861 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 31002 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2016 19:28:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Nov 2016 19:28:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=dclarke@blastwave.org; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=dclarke@blastwave.org; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain blastwave.org from 209.17.115.51 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: dclarke@blastwave.org X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.17.115.51 atl4mhob13.myregisteredsite.com Received: from [209.17.115.51] ([209.17.115.51:52990] helo=atl4mhob13.myregisteredsite.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 0D/63-05927-B4D67285 for ; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 14:28:11 -0500 Received: from mailpod.hostingplatform.com ([10.30.77.36]) by atl4mhob13.myregisteredsite.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id uACJS6NI027345 for ; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 14:28:07 -0500 Received: (qmail 11453 invoked by uid 0); 12 Nov 2016 19:28:06 -0000 X-TCPREMOTEIP: 99.253.103.29 X-Authenticated-UID: dclarke@blastwave.org Received: from unknown (HELO ?172.16.35.41?) (dclarke@blastwave.org@99.253.103.29) by 0 with ESMTPA; 12 Nov 2016 19:28:06 -0000 To: internals@lists.php.net References: Message-ID: <5ef2496f-e06e-5eff-9547-95021ba0d7f5@blastwave.org> Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 14:28:00 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: C89 vs. C99 From: dclarke@blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke) On 11/12/2016 06:27 AM, Christoph M. Becker wrote: > On 12.06.2016 at 11:08, Fleshgrinder wrote: > >> I am curious why we are not finally doing the switch to C99 with VC14 >> finally supporting most of C99. I mean, I know that GCC and VC14 do no >> fully support C99 but the most common features are implemented: >> >> - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C99#Implementations >> - https://gcc.gnu.org/c99status.html > > What about other compilers such as Solaris Studio and XL C? > Oracle Studio compiler tools are fully compliant with C99 and has been for a very very long time. I would also note that php7.x does not compile out of the box, yet. However I am looking into why. Dennis Clarke