Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:96845 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 75464 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2016 11:27:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Nov 2016 11:27:02 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=cmbecker69@gmx.de; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=cmbecker69@gmx.de; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmx.de designates 212.227.15.18 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: cmbecker69@gmx.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.227.15.18 mout.gmx.net Received: from [212.227.15.18] ([212.227.15.18:62249] helo=mout.gmx.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 54/D0-35596-58CF6285 for ; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 06:27:01 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.190] ([79.243.119.150]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MPE7E-1c9uBG04jQ-004UQr for ; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 12:26:58 +0100 To: internals@lists.php.net References: Message-ID: Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 12:27:02 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:5XWqvzaavg6kGSsqmx4AkWxFjfte6i5nim63/fltEEHM8slVJ99 2ZqempWG1pu6BC58Ikr54nqC83WJBM26Kocg3WH9OBjB7DY5GHz0/ooFFzUfB1CBbS8UtkN DtC7fRms69UUdJBIMC2aZd9l8eYN48lLR8Eq0itkE0VUwFPPsZQN/nX2rrvZa+dMts0CN56 Qf7RMp65U9rlKXJlPbBtw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:Gi/t1ZcSsBM=:qjRnTklNh3Qe54cpZP7zue 1DkEBSQishaigw1npfpPJ8rSxOCxpi/AhR+jjV81pg7TfhHZMwE7MLCNk0x7GFp6nbdgYJSsZ 3X3dwyEm01sDBAIlTKEXZTdvl5TQ+q42BmxfJi5QDfaf4fjTWGE3NmTy9cUzK/HpOEnspRoY2 AHcQoiLYteMbK9bURqkNp76hswOkOGmCkvBOjmmzcoWTVr6Zc8U5dBzDOzXlI4064WHFfbSkF bBkqmDdqlZQUAND9gt7Y/2X2QlnznFkVHm+40+Brsuw2h5H4KrBQM4sc0QQnOJyhRJLBnCt0d xBdYJU6kLUbdNpGDk/SsqJ5sbwzupUhP0EQk25pHsCPWKq+u5KQiw/FXo5B35tNovj1ga93MY z5HuiD/DG8Yv4O/8O/wlgBWSPZCP8AZIZC90L8P48IYuoGk3EePiWrcAPA0IUrYcGfG3nrCn2 umqRhj3M01dxIVaybJd+5jNUow3bAoz1UyNxeehuEam4FNFMr9dPsPcv8jGL5SH4+n9Q55Qdt ElfQ84DiV82q+wzI1FKK9ukl9jXLfSy5ziTxMT4J+UP7ZZW7sCjuKdXzCZdWHTxsbD9hxZU1F zmeA/BTlY2D0oH2UygyH5tnTs5yrRbko57J5XPsk5zErygnrHOGvMBAcw9lj/tNNCuM5fG6Jx Obz7S5nnMFJbCKAYklc+nWKNtTBe2oPsHPGzH9B8OTOey7vOMVoG8fFzkSpfZGLjP9Ilkdcib +FicYoHHtOpDhMX02vka2WH+2SkmmYmgPKX4Pu9mIxKz+G05m2iZSlocaCtH3nCT548sdhMqJ itohq5Y Subject: Re: C89 vs. C99 From: cmbecker69@gmx.de ("Christoph M. Becker") On 12.06.2016 at 11:08, Fleshgrinder wrote: > I am curious why we are not finally doing the switch to C99 with VC14 > finally supporting most of C99. I mean, I know that GCC and VC14 do no > fully support C99 but the most common features are implemented: > > - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C99#Implementations > - https://gcc.gnu.org/c99status.html What about other compilers such as Solaris Studio and XL C? -- Christoph M. Becker