Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:96811
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain pthreads.org from 74.125.82.47 cause and error)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAPg3XxJBnBexST5eJLuGbstt=jWZ3XkH0mi8iHx==gZuw1jjvw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABdc3Wpx37dV28Z55kejhzFMpxADp-aN-oO8KWSriV_L59VAiw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAL=_i_kTWEbfaANN99WFAnxf3RcvtpFozyqNn=ZZgVGQwwUa0Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <0c171a20-c72d-4157-1117-6628a52dd1f0@gmx.de> <CANUQDCgHMu9X=mWZtAumCBOdGKYaenmf2Hz1rAspZDGnfCTuuA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPg3XxJBnBexST5eJLuGbstt=jWZ3XkH0mi8iHx==gZuw1jjvw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 10:38:40 +0000
Message-ID: <CAL=_i_=xPtRbJk159oNWxVxd+4n+_GDRJwRLJ3rW8_w=GG9v5g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Cowburn <petercowburn@gmail.com>
Cc: Niklas Keller <me@kelunik.com>, "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@gmx.de>, 
	=?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_Brzuchalski?= <michal@brzuchalski.com>, 
	PHP Internals List <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1130ca9218afec0540effa26
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][VOTE] Object typehint
From: pthreads@pthreads.org (Joe Watkins)

--001a1130ca9218afec0540effa26
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Morning Peter,

> I'll put RFC: On hold, then apply patch, draft some info in RFC and then
set up new voting.

Just a few messages up from here ...

Would you prefer a new thread to make that announcement (I think it may be
better) ?

Cheers
Joe

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Peter Cowburn <petercowburn@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On 10 November 2016 at 09:11, Niklas Keller <me@kelunik.com> wrote:
>
>> 2016-11-09 21:53 GMT+01:00 Christoph M. Becker <cmbecker69@gmx.de>:
>>
>> > On 09.11.2016 at 17:28, Joe Watkins wrote:
>> >
>> > >     I want to explain why I voted no on this:
>> > >
>> > >     I think it's significantly less useful without variance, varianc=
e
>> is
>> > > something that is usually difficult to achieve in PHP, but not for
>> this
>> > > feature in particular.
>> >
>> > Can you please elaborate what you mean with variance?  I see some
>> > practical use cases for covariance of a method with return type object=
,
>> > but I don't see how contravariance could be achieved for parameters of
>> > type object.
>> >
>> > If your suggestion is only about invariance of object return types, I'=
m
>> > not sure if this very special case would make sense (for consistency
>> > reasons).
>> >
>>
>> We already have it for iterable -> array. We would have it for all other
>> types if there wouldn't be an implementation issue.
>>
>> Regards, Niklas
>>
>> Cheers,
>> > Christoph
>> >
>> > >     I absolutely want it, but I want it to be properly useful.
>> > >
>> > >     If the RFC were halted and patched to include variance, I'd +1 i=
t.
>> > >
>> > > Cheers
>> > > Joe
>> > >
>> > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Micha=C5=82 Brzuchalski
>> <michal@brzuchalski.
>> > .com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Hi everyone,
>> > >>
>> > >> Two weeks have passed since this RFC was put to discussion here.
>> > >>
>> > >> Therefore, I'm going to put it to a vote for inclusion in PHP 7.2.
>> > >>
>> > >> Voting starts today, 2016-11-06, and will close after two weeks on
>> the
>> > >> Sunday 2016-11-20 at midnight.
>> > >>
>> > >> The RFC and voting widget can be found here:
>> > >> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/object-typehint
>>
>
> The vote appears to be closed right now, did I miss an announcement?
>
>
>>
>> > >>
>> > >> It's a normal 2/3 majority required vote.
>> > >>
>> > >> Thanks!
>> > >> --
>> > >> regards / pozdrawiam,
>> > >> --
>> > >> Micha=C5=82 Brzuchalski
>> > >> about.me/brzuchal
>> > >> brzuchalski.com
>> > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
>> > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>

--001a1130ca9218afec0540effa26--