Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:96773 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 49658 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2016 14:28:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 8 Nov 2016 14:28:30 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=alice@librelamp.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=alice@librelamp.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain librelamp.com designates 45.79.96.192 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: alice@librelamp.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 45.79.96.192 librelamp.com Received: from [45.79.96.192] ([45.79.96.192:44572] helo=librelamp.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 1E/F2-23587-C01E1285 for ; Tue, 08 Nov 2016 09:28:30 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-50-184-37-123.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [50.184.37.123]) by librelamp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E4EB42C4 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2016 14:28:25 +0000 (UTC) To: internals@lists.php.net References: <46.92.05967.9AB91285@pb1.pair.com> Message-ID: <0e8fbcf4-1bcf-02e6-9323-ddd910506ddb@librelamp.com> Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 06:28:24 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] DateTime microseconds discussion From: alice@librelamp.com (Alice Wonder) On 11/08/2016 04:16 AM, Arjen Schol wrote: > Hi Dan, > > I think you make some bad assumptions here. The examples provided by > Sjon are scripts submitted to 3v4l.org They may have bad assumptions, > but are real life examples of DateTime usage. And they will break. They are already broken. That's the point. Rarely will the current breakage trigger but it will trigger. Personally I prefer it when bad code obviously triggers, it can be very difficult (read expensive) to track bugs in code that only rarely and randomly trigger.