Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:96660 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 56305 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2016 21:30:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 30 Oct 2016 21:30:57 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=cmbecker69@gmx.de; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=cmbecker69@gmx.de; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmx.de designates 212.227.17.22 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: cmbecker69@gmx.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.227.17.22 mout.gmx.net Received: from [212.227.17.22] ([212.227.17.22:51429] helo=mout.gmx.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id E1/76-25911-C8666185 for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 16:30:53 -0500 Received: from [192.168.2.103] ([79.243.119.150]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LlDx4-1cYdkV0Po6-00b4C5 for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 22:30:49 +0100 X-Mozilla-News-Host: news://news.php.net:119 To: PHP Internals Message-ID: <9d918ef7-f0eb-80b7-9689-fa6527e3ba68@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 22:30:54 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:InMdgys6wGBvkx6WQTBb07wIOUqGhpPOA7COvT5eg5JSTQ6/EKM 0T9Y8sJaYJVYSbPwXzwwGRNk5f0iQTjguV3LPVOkGpUG3B/40oNap0KBm77mFrE94+Pcjyn PLjbEtIvB/mGE2RFIjpH664Yo5bJ1ySroaHppfXiGYWkhZHHQYoU+n5w1bQRnagbpBH8yvl UaHAgwK3Y+s4TED4IJNJQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:64KroM+6EBU=:K1KXJTcrg1iL5xezD6mdRo dt8AQiw81+WH/ype+kVWbXKzAxPC8uj4QxGl2r/avBQ9mswgvyzxbZ1MKa9XKA5ISuK0P9iAE iljnqRwAVGomAdh94GcmSsmYKiSW5VDMxGSwW/UVLBRB9phG3AWj12MqEZ5norQEdjGzXF2e7 rKfjIysFmbj7a98dxYZVa0dMoP0t6bk8g8iTikQrQ8rXgAR0+Cs8w1KAAmIGNCz1HFzHHlm5O jqNroMBWtj3RHf6P50wza27pB2IaZGWeRkxVOkIjyRfeHlDgLUnJO+g+qqflmclcQZUVQoJcH 1Ny0QxgnYblRYctSrhTISxA7AqdjX25sPYT6iMiw37TKbrzE4E6P2PGrZsGdJXNJsoYH/zpwJ ZYNftLousP0UlyByKGkTrXP0T6ZvR/PKxSrkouHKSBC+Wb9qUd3zck5qV6nf1I8ukVKGc+aTH jdL1gaZittSjUZ15tJlHAUOsqV9vpHf2CHRHcBrdWdJNqKfUXUzTC/+/omcjnitGNQ6BOIvLG xGQKgf50lYIudZD5DAPs+jV0Fx5FR5Aoaqy3GD7Td+b1iF6Uh8GV80G6EhrVfgDaupKKZf3A8 jAKJHRadL7F1y1cqpksK51WNW3/G3FKwSd9vn01gadSU0THysJGdBxjVX9qQESXYPFXnIhy5F jynzUwjfX5gTKQ3HdApzai+VRUKTvrHj/r6o7O3KFtpUBiG7QVNe5rj4CqDe6keEkQBmH9NSg g4CCQ+2Jg5TYNWIYbxuSJi4bL9bCCNoBN5+kxPRdBRkmEEA/gOK0jYY/RaH5PkV6CFpNo+O7E xu9JnST Subject: [VOTE] Deprecate png2wbmp() and jpeg2wbmp() From: cmbecker69@gmx.de ("Christoph M. Becker") Hi! As there has been no discussion in the RFC's discussion thread[1], I assume there is nothing to discuss, so I've just put the "Deprecate png2wbmp() and jpeg2wbmp()" RFC[2] to voting. The voting period ends on 2016-11-13, 22:00 UTC. Thanks in advance for voting! [1] [2] -- Christoph M. Becker