Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:96531 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 3652 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2016 23:01:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Oct 2016 23:01:46 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=vchkpw@developersdesk.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=vchkpw@developersdesk.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain developersdesk.com designates 204.228.229.4 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: vchkpw@developersdesk.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 204.228.229.4 lessa.developersdesk.com Received: from [204.228.229.4] ([204.228.229.4:45576] helo=mail.developersdesk.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 31/FC-24564-7DC49085 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 19:01:45 -0400 Received: (qmail 7431 invoked by uid 89); 20 Oct 2016 23:01:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.151?) (vchkpw@developersdesk.com@160.3.210.129) by 0 with ESMTPA; 20 Oct 2016 23:01:54 -0000 To: internals@lists.php.net References: <1eab7492-596c-ffd2-81ed-0eb9256a033e@gmail.com> <0B722A15-A29F-498B-987F-F6BA5AA49EEF@bobs-bits.com> <6f67a2c1-d386-0ab3-5c3b-fe1402a0a925@gmail.com> Message-ID: Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 17:01:32 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] header() removes all header of the same name. From: vchkpw@developersdesk.com (Rick Widmer) On 10/20/2016 4:58 PM, Guy Marriott wrote: > FWIW Yasuo, I also think this is a bad idea. If you remove the ability to > set cookie _headers_ with the header function then the function needs a > more appropriate name - perhaps headerExceptCookie. > > That makes 5 people opposed - 100% of the individuals who have responded in > this thread. 6.