Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:96502 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 26303 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2016 07:19:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Oct 2016 07:19:52 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=yohgaki@ohgaki.net; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=yohgaki@ohgaki.net; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain ohgaki.net designates 180.42.98.130 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: yohgaki@ohgaki.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 180.42.98.130 ns1.es-i.jp Received: from [180.42.98.130] ([180.42.98.130:45721] helo=es-i.jp) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 12/30-24564-51078085 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 03:19:51 -0400 Received: (qmail 107466 invoked by uid 89); 20 Oct 2016 07:19:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail-qk0-f174.google.com) (yohgaki@ohgaki.net@209.85.220.174) by 0 with ESMTPA; 20 Oct 2016 07:19:46 -0000 Received: by mail-qk0-f174.google.com with SMTP id o68so76504445qkf.3 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 00:19:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RmZAXQCn0Z+TgY/mggnpXThaDs3JdDRcQSzyMpqDauoVsWV2r8MYFvbU2+3hHJqHt7r3Ut0VPdbD5O3UQ== X-Received: by 10.55.121.133 with SMTP id u127mr9544152qkc.233.1476947979763; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 00:19:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.22.38 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 00:18:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <088801d229fa$d7320cb0$85962610$@belski.net> References: <070001d2295e$76b7d730$64278590$@belski.net> <075a01d22993$9efc6c80$dcf54580$@belski.net> <088801d229fa$d7320cb0$85962610$@belski.net> Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 16:18:58 +0900 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: To: Anatol Belski Cc: Joe Watkins , Niklas Keller , Leigh , PHP Internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC][DISCUSSION] Improve uniqid() uniqueness From: yohgaki@ohgaki.net (Yasuo Ohgaki) Hi Anatol, On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 8:20 PM, Anatol Belski wrot= e: >> I won't have time to write RFC for this, probably. I have many other thi= ngs that I >> would like to improve, like session error status handling improvement th= at I >> recently proposed. >> > I see. It's a pity you won't have time to write an RFC. I see one already= in place on the wiki though. I see also your several other patches hanging= on gihtub. IMHO it is a real waste of time to abandon the work you've done= , without really pulling it through. With uniqid(), maybe it'd be even the = right decision to return to your original RFC, or just to reduce it to comp= ly with the simple patch variant. I'm sure, that no one wants to lose the g= ood contributions, even though it might take some effort to reach the commo= n ground sometimes. I meant I wouldn't have time for RFC only replace php_combined_lcg(). I'll address uniqid() improvement sometime in the future. To all, We constantly get "uniqid() is not unique" bug reports. In the meantime, any objection for adding following note to uniqid() manual= . "Do not make assumption for uniqid() output format, entropy especially. uniqid() output format may be changed to provide reasonably unique ID in future versions." Regards, -- Yasuo Ohgaki yohgaki@ohgaki.net