Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:96422
Return-Path: <lester@lsces.co.uk>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 1974 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2016 11:00:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 18 Oct 2016 11:00:54 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lester@lsces.co.uk; sender-id=unknown
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lester@lsces.co.uk; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lsces.co.uk from 217.147.176.214 cause and error)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lester@lsces.co.uk
X-Host-Fingerprint: 217.147.176.214 mail4-2.serversure.net Linux 2.6
Received: from [217.147.176.214] ([217.147.176.214:33578] helo=mail4.serversure.net)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 50/B9-40890-2E006085 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 07:00:51 -0400
Received: (qmail 18384 invoked by uid 89); 18 Oct 2016 11:00:40 -0000
Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 18374, pid: 18381, t: 0.0333s
         scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.96/m:52/d:10677
Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.0.0.7?) (lester@rainbowdigitalmedia.org.uk@81.138.11.136)
  by mail4.serversure.net with ESMTPA; 18 Oct 2016 11:00:40 -0000
To: internals@lists.php.net
References: <CAGa2bXYg1kkoYGQNr8T2oTshuqrvweefYO+EdY41w1vwUM32iQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPwsocHhsm9Zrh=rpF=Pbct6t5wKfAa-wirGfGjmxV8pi4nttw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGa2bXaMMaZn1GyrnT6Bgz3xCMDkFs+YNwHoNZe_1ge5LjLPDg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPwsocHXhpQNCYXVN0DHj77M0cA3eAgKuStOPquNUjx=46W1Mw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGa2bXaEyd+Qcc7EAQwTEVJY-zD_cK37AYXfM_534YesBG0xOA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPwsocHqbeYw=2S6EZG+5zUEWMSM5V2OoG9uLO05sbQffJ1GPw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGa2bXZGWFW1gXx4uuAehw0MGADWPMXVuD7wsSJuAQ6f6HJv6A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGa2bXZ1wGO_x4z5agJ0+uWX4xfuOYX1or4KziwbMa9v_+-JxA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANUQDCh9RSnOs__c4crYsH44z0L-mHkTTCgAn-d1bSgH09yL0w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGa2bXbDR4EnSU0UUMQR4OGaEAJGPkf7s9M+56CyCPvJ=XSbUQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANUQDChPsJHZ73=ke_yo+Pbu2B8rRcFrUYZWJiD5TrwECY4hEA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGa2bXZ98ZKER2hRp=2pvTYGVLGXFzkdefFfoERojgQvarHUBw@mail.gmail.com>
 <52a34722-ccd4-b875-2c1b-f704117ef708@lsces.co.uk>
 <CANUQDCiM7E8beona_M6nDiGNfT53Fg_rZwgozuEycw629aNNSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <26f72884-49ed-5b1e-1860-3d477f7d9be0@lsces.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 12:00:40 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CANUQDCiM7E8beona_M6nDiGNfT53Fg_rZwgozuEycw629aNNSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC][DISCUSSION] Improve uniqid() uniqueness
From: lester@lsces.co.uk (Lester Caine)

On 18/10/16 11:02, Niklas Keller wrote:
>> 'Suppliers' should perhaps be helped to configure their systems so the
>> > users can use things, but things like /dev/urandom may need some
>> > additional notes to help identify problems when frameworks like owncloud
>> > start throwing errors. As Niklas says it's shared environments where
>> > this one may bite.
>> >
> Just to be clear: I don't argue that those systems are broken, I just say
> that there is a BC break for those systems and that this has to be
> documented.

Yes ... and the RFC process is at least part of the documentation.

-- 
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-----------------------------
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk
Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk