Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:96411
Return-Path: <me@kelunik.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 73583 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2016 07:16:38 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 18 Oct 2016 07:16:38 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=me@kelunik.com; sender-id=unknown
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=me@kelunik.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain kelunik.com from 81.169.146.160 cause and error)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: me@kelunik.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 81.169.146.160 mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de  
Received: from [81.169.146.160] ([81.169.146.160:26477] helo=mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id EE/84-40890-55CC5085 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 03:16:37 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1476774994; l=2930;
	s=domk; d=kelunik.com;
	h=Content-Type:Cc:To:Subject:Date:From:In-Reply-To:References:
	MIME-Version;
	bh=ODY2bDLD8hJStrzunTb4NlK5UHbBpruTh82y4ZdwFjg=;
	b=WZd/89TRDQ8b7pt5y0dolcX9oyGfVjdJF1cIRiT/0b25Fag7fiQwt/y6oG4i9RUHnJM
	kzDJ++xCWVnSNQ7xOr9a2CRO6HiKaVLNC75FR5uYFHKg4KFEB6N/dgcJMGvaxDYmvbSgx
	OR0zt+Ork2gBckeSXENVqZkrK7ljZvyI4kI=
X-RZG-AUTH: :IWkkfkWkbvHsXQGmRYmUo9mls2vWuiu+7SLDup6E67mzuoNKBqX53Q==
X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00
Received: from mail-lf0-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41])
	by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 39.6 AUTH)
	with ESMTPSA id d056a6s9I7GY8Hw
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (curve secp384r1 with 384 ECDH bits, eq. 7680 bits RSA))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	for <internals@lists.php.net>;
	Tue, 18 Oct 2016 09:16:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-lf0-f41.google.com with SMTP id b81so328657359lfe.1
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 00:16:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9Rm3ntbFPyyvoGzc30Y6mS8/5+DHGOBWVXW5Z15hrzm96eTqmlu38LCLWerFniY+VPbz7YWh4WRFFaFGEw==
X-Received: by 10.28.18.5 with SMTP id 5mr5357132wms.35.1476774993943; Tue, 18
 Oct 2016 00:16:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAGa2bXYg1kkoYGQNr8T2oTshuqrvweefYO+EdY41w1vwUM32iQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGa2bXZLB6SsC3FQyntaDy93YfG5rDigJH6GpC5dF7MZJuJ=LQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGa2bXaM_rSbmSx_bPE4erG6ok1KLdXSqnJP5ngxUNBsrzu0pw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPwsocHhsm9Zrh=rpF=Pbct6t5wKfAa-wirGfGjmxV8pi4nttw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGa2bXaMMaZn1GyrnT6Bgz3xCMDkFs+YNwHoNZe_1ge5LjLPDg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPwsocHXhpQNCYXVN0DHj77M0cA3eAgKuStOPquNUjx=46W1Mw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGa2bXaEyd+Qcc7EAQwTEVJY-zD_cK37AYXfM_534YesBG0xOA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPwsocHqbeYw=2S6EZG+5zUEWMSM5V2OoG9uLO05sbQffJ1GPw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGa2bXZGWFW1gXx4uuAehw0MGADWPMXVuD7wsSJuAQ6f6HJv6A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGa2bXZ1wGO_x4z5agJ0+uWX4xfuOYX1or4KziwbMa9v_+-JxA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANUQDCh9RSnOs__c4crYsH44z0L-mHkTTCgAn-d1bSgH09yL0w@mail.gmail.com> <CAGa2bXbDR4EnSU0UUMQR4OGaEAJGPkf7s9M+56CyCPvJ=XSbUQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGa2bXbDR4EnSU0UUMQR4OGaEAJGPkf7s9M+56CyCPvJ=XSbUQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 07:16:23 +0000
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CANUQDChPsJHZ73=ke_yo+Pbu2B8rRcFrUYZWJiD5TrwECY4hEA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CANUQDChPsJHZ73=ke_yo+Pbu2B8rRcFrUYZWJiD5TrwECY4hEA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Yasuo Ohgaki <yohgaki@ohgaki.net>
Cc: Leigh <leight@gmail.com>, PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11469796ed6750053f1e7845
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC][DISCUSSION] Improve uniqid() uniqueness
From: me@kelunik.com (Niklas Keller)

--001a11469796ed6750053f1e7845
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Yasuo Ohgaki <yohgaki@ohgaki.net> schrieb am Di., 18. Okt. 2016, 08:47:

> Hi Niklas,
>
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Niklas Keller <me@kelunik.com> wrote:
> > Yasuo Ohgaki <yohgaki@ohgaki.net> schrieb am Di., 18. Okt. 2016, 02:21:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I committed this patch that simply use php_random_bytes() w/o any BC.
> >
> >
> > Doesn't this throw now in some environments where /dev/urandom isn't
> > readable?
>
> It could happen, but such system should not be used now a days.
>

Sure, but it did happen that shared hosts block it, noticed during
random_compat adoption.

You claimed there isn't any BC break.

Regards, Niklas

Regards,
>
> --
> Yasuo Ohgaki
> yohgaki@ohgaki.net
>

--001a11469796ed6750053f1e7845--