Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:96409 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 69618 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2016 06:48:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 18 Oct 2016 06:48:44 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=yohgaki@ohgaki.net; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=yohgaki@ohgaki.net; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain ohgaki.net designates 180.42.98.130 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: yohgaki@ohgaki.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 180.42.98.130 ns1.es-i.jp Received: from [180.42.98.130] ([180.42.98.130:39914] helo=es-i.jp) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id BE/D3-40890-AC5C5085 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 02:48:44 -0400 Received: (qmail 39555 invoked by uid 89); 18 Oct 2016 06:48:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail-qk0-f178.google.com) (yohgaki@ohgaki.net@209.85.220.178) by 0 with ESMTPA; 18 Oct 2016 06:48:39 -0000 Received: by mail-qk0-f178.google.com with SMTP id o68so319386430qkf.3 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 23:48:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RnbQlqIdCSfs8URzd5jU3ybr+6axsKHk+eCCfJOp6nV0e/+7quVIxH97pphN8o7ZOhCthwof+PZde2s5w== X-Received: by 10.55.72.209 with SMTP id v200mr981543qka.262.1476773313712; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 23:48:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.84.168 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 23:47:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 15:47:53 +0900 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: To: Niklas Keller Cc: Leigh , PHP Internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC][DISCUSSION] Improve uniqid() uniqueness From: yohgaki@ohgaki.net (Yasuo Ohgaki) Hi Niklas, On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Niklas Keller wrote: > Yasuo Ohgaki schrieb am Di., 18. Okt. 2016, 02:21: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I committed this patch that simply use php_random_bytes() w/o any BC. > > > Doesn't this throw now in some environments where /dev/urandom isn't > readable? It could happen, but such system should not be used now a days. Regards, -- Yasuo Ohgaki yohgaki@ohgaki.net