Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:96381 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 82704 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2016 14:24:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 15 Oct 2016 14:24:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=cmbecker69@gmx.de; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=cmbecker69@gmx.de; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmx.de designates 212.227.17.21 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: cmbecker69@gmx.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.227.17.21 mout.gmx.net Received: from [212.227.17.21] ([212.227.17.21:56288] helo=mout.gmx.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id C0/82-59423-92C32085 for ; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 10:24:42 -0400 Received: from [192.168.2.103] ([79.243.119.150]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LaGfK-1cgFxI23e2-00m5q5 for ; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 16:24:38 +0200 X-Mozilla-News-Host: news://news.php.net:119 To: internals@lists.php.net Message-ID: <95fdb563-dda2-9247-0e7e-b269e3b46272@gmx.de> Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2016 16:25:22 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:7EL9igerlaPeqTrvx0VYmTfE/RZYj2xPiAjUW2Yca3Bedwyw0ag dJnGtHLz5JurV0rXd5RMeksw/xgqGw8S0znBasJf1gLL83e0W94E23lL6806i4ga6p/VkNZ WUYwLY2GMhcwHc+TzlAZ6pEtf2+qgzYSUnS6hwtoQYS5v2T5FDxvMZX6IrYEdbBkoRxFbyY X//sh4elmbQAGwwisk1og== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:rjv4oseEPnM=:4/H6aGDW8kOVaEWnzV1hh8 w3HhKUaJbpByK1r0XwBGKzDv0mazP5yAxrv23CLbAvKVjjxoaLYBb6lYVRq3id8CKtcvLPt7F uyq5nw9RJN6ZSZdqUx4AIPvy4OgJS2l8ZTPStyqn/VNaiy3KJKSbFUwujV1OL+9PHS7uS1PV9 hD9pmnSDnwlKDdHJlpzXFvFuePOMv9INA6Uzjqoy1YG0rLibE6hJRqd9qBV3Xo6yW8gOhXJUx LoAFHtOvXVzxF3YQAkt+TOBUil6GFY0HSelyqsmMkRMAsP9ibWwLaF6hlLr/PEpAZ/oXIgC9d F4ZmKFF9vQ1E8XoCBNpVMUhI8Etzj3Cvk1KMbqJFdVkO25TdAYm+ZX0aCLfy9dznuM4CaC0qF F7sASjb/21vZSDRDQqDSxv5rB2MPHGTb2tpM7exiTHZgDH0FtJDt86fPX1LtYPzkpx2r3d8En y4ZCZuCiOSDcg98QMlek0B9vyb0fAng5a1cm0dI+x40VNqaJ7wAPSYpLfnJOLfiKoect+mHT/ l/rgYgudJV3CHaqbIedl/h9IulHvAWUX3nVowfA5o/NAXmEh25dYgTkxAbK4eMhHAOtWeO6VC 9hKKBhQcBZIETG9QYmouHRXPP/udKb5nhKj9iTf+sj9t3HJD9JvzG2GsggR5RStJx95YqNYO6 7URqeFy+RII5ge4j+6nSsG1a+zzDVOHxeo+8YMHQU7kAzDpy2rZfK3/J2e2LE7BjCqgkLd2mj pfM4jqTYlwxRCXo+p+I2ALXCPx+Dz5QUvo2+b1rOXguJhzgPnmgd04R9oyI7ma9yCm4SYGHIm yHjtXti Subject: [RFC] Deprecate png2wbmp() and jpeg2wbmp() From: cmbecker69@gmx.de ("Christoph M. Becker") Hi! I've create an RFC to deprecate and later remove the png2wbmp() and jpeg2wbmp() functions, and put it under discussion: Comments are appreciated! -- Christoph M. Becker