Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:96244 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 33284 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2016 06:27:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 5 Oct 2016 06:27:28 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=vpkaihla@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=vpkaihla@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.215.53 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: vpkaihla@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.215.53 mail-lf0-f53.google.com Received: from [209.85.215.53] ([209.85.215.53:34305] helo=mail-lf0-f53.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id CC/60-23443-05D94F75 for ; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 02:27:28 -0400 Received: by mail-lf0-f53.google.com with SMTP id b81so82511338lfe.1 for ; Tue, 04 Oct 2016 23:27:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=NbTAnpuOlHFF+UJ8Htu6jRRI5Lvhbm9fusq9z/0AQf4=; b=bEdWw091QWf+K/eQ2T3EMXNP+418pBu+4eqQ121A4YCOP8zYiGNt/HXL1bAiExRFrv jAEgJjUAWqqDZ4Lb6PxBFcojcyab6Ntuo5oja1VYsGUYbIiqlKsY3co/zC03OkDh+zqY wzoK0N4VRUG9drTqnEoZ7Ag7aPO0wK+IBSpM41rC4NbmCQMrzvr/fO8xWQjH04+NRCDs r92Xo6mzr0vxL6YULmekHUrqGuar6oYHBKKRt8HetFCbaq+PqDnKPj2OjvR0RXaMkvOI HWf/0OnhYuWa/7NN18Gj7J0tjK8s3rszX1quQxs4AhRWWbzP8cpaMopa68eEA9phOFlM kJgg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=NbTAnpuOlHFF+UJ8Htu6jRRI5Lvhbm9fusq9z/0AQf4=; b=bj9E70XurpDnKPSLLflAsvuyY/NRybwQwOkEh84y1x0YFBzOHOYxdXJPo/XVY6Nt8C SNDg9VgMGSmeQklT3pTLNbbDqCFAFqQ/tey4UgH2efdxAf1d8TcpX4tzBiu54TYZHvo/ +lQqnQNYrCZ6x9A4Y7kQDl430BIRFUQgz3fsV37F/ac45mGF77lLw3nU2x847Il2cYQ0 SS/G6KOyxhoDp0778CdFDwYv5yRV0xnEzK108czT5QQLqBQpRfbtdVzlt/dlBUXl3/MH /OrE9ExOsCPTSdhPc5NEiCQ6zl27p9GP6F3hb7DUgJIIO2TJgSD+0yJiB6lmsK0bPTT+ xm+g== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RniCbYpBUL6mBgZggps5+EfaGpx94CuUrTsFx8ngQob0iPotxTaEUvLB+kjOIuo47i+nPTrTNq/6bideg== X-Received: by 10.46.32.31 with SMTP id g31mr3013519ljg.47.1475648844491; Tue, 04 Oct 2016 23:27:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 06:27:13 +0000 Message-ID: To: internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1142bcd030744a053e1845f9 Subject: Re: RFC: Strict comparisons From: vpkaihla@gmail.com (Vesa Kaihlavirta) --001a1142bcd030744a053e1845f9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 at 16:04 Vesa Kaihlavirta wrote: > Hey all, > > I've been bouncing this idea of fixing all comparison operations in one > fell swoop, although with an opt-in declare in the spirit of strict_types. > > So, I thought about this for a while, and decided against doing this RFC myself. If anyone else wants to pick it up, go ahead. Best of luck to you all! --vk --001a1142bcd030744a053e1845f9--