Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:95706 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 45268 invoked from network); 6 Sep 2016 21:51:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 6 Sep 2016 21:51:54 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=danack@basereality.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=danack@basereality.com; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain basereality.com from 209.85.213.45 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: danack@basereality.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.213.45 mail-vk0-f45.google.com Received: from [209.85.213.45] ([209.85.213.45:35346] helo=mail-vk0-f45.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 05/E2-18051-97A3FC75 for ; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 17:51:54 -0400 Received: by mail-vk0-f45.google.com with SMTP id j189so103221277vkc.2 for ; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 14:51:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=basereality-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=naRmYxDo2UjJBj6PWLqmamseLO3s5vYl851OX/8k+PE=; b=j1Ija2YDiCPz+5qquOU5S3TkfNGotWkBr10Xin+Ne7d/CNm8qEFbsLF7DrzxBRBpnk i/R922ytXj/AcLthjP6TBOf425tK52sV+oOiT18JxOlr+McxMhQu9hcoEQzQ9+l+YrkA GSPoL3DaZW0OLubnwybrfQ7RElJgbNUh6NExJFbsRD3b55b0s+uDQ2Iu4QJ+8Er7H1hR LE3lXD7bWLI8a06xWHQdijO5AbBnYTyv6dhOVv6kHu15vC+auW9yd1psxGXPQ1RsqH8D 4ZPo0Fu1goQrNpTEHmPENgZ04enfbau8/ITZose5NxukZ4ZKNh64CS4gVb/IIW4sHUHH MJsg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=naRmYxDo2UjJBj6PWLqmamseLO3s5vYl851OX/8k+PE=; b=U1dQ+Y64Q0aguSpFZhPbXm+4DLJ/6NP2peHwRd9QJgDcUMt/wviLnb0LDpEnjWDcXW xPZFqNzlqPqqq6hc2TyrkaDWKm/oN7wgVUbdggbw9ZZWM0tlM5RUqVVqQkXq6zwpdgtm edScEwCgb2KxKi8SIhCPs0Ivb7u7+kPC5FiX+LrZ7qNrjh9NBt3yrOc/dDtozgugqOxj pNy491m84GP2xC10oijib8nlJRfWVAQ2gV6csIrr2TK63LqxFzZHZMSOAe/bRsVdl5S4 NitNvuSJgM7x3avQ6ZUN3dgYqrwddoXAa5U8TY6YzUz3eev8NFvyOludtuN4OADEl+yK 1AnA== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwMwOPrTrVEfP/di5iZ4W0+htGxnSBKIR8MamSzMVE+yEttMrU5U7C1V7f2gMMIMLrG6jcfR7iaDJLa7QA== X-Received: by 10.31.192.2 with SMTP id q2mr23099551vkf.44.1473198710774; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 14:51:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.176.69.4 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Sep 2016 14:51:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [78.145.254.9] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 22:51:50 +0100 Message-ID: To: Davey Shafik Cc: Andrea Faulds , "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PREVOTE] PHP Engine Constants From: danack@basereality.com (Dan Ackroyd) On 6 September 2016 at 22:39, Davey Shafik wrote: > > > The key to this is that it's part of the spec. If you actually want to > follow the spec, you have to implement it this way. If you don't, then > you're a bad person. :P Perhaps you can make the RFC text be clearer then. e.g. to this bit: "PHP_ENGINE =E2=80=94 A simple string denoting the runtime engine, e.g. php= or hhvm" add something like "The contents of the string MUST be unique to the runtime engine being used." because currently, to me, there's nothing in the RFC that actually says how it needs to be implemented by other engines. cheers Dan