Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:95512 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 36833 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2016 07:10:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 31 Aug 2016 07:10:30 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ocramius@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ocramius@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.44 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ocramius@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.44 mail-wm0-f44.google.com Received: from [74.125.82.44] ([74.125.82.44:37818] helo=mail-wm0-f44.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id AC/71-11399-4E286C75 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 03:10:29 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f44.google.com with SMTP id i5so72082748wmg.0 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:10:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=xp6C8Pl8BnkFZdEr5FVAvbCqXGvN2Qet1hoXw8Civz8=; b=JsC43iml7Scv8etqCrUn171RFELWlCk/GGj9NzP/d0dQL6F8ahDbY8vx9z+Sk7wasC MuRFrgpRgkIi1hnNJqELn5WRWwO4kfOyb/Nzn8UDfxY7abG+H8/A1xdp8ZRO0Q7xWhTv uRJIXHfBu0okq4Sn4cKk0sva6cHTva4GRRE8UrYWlFk6qMRR544g/G+aDqg8/yomse8w dBKxQ9z+ieOr4uHgs9sdFh852MGwVpzoNt1TaZw0aDmvxQcJw+rKNm+K6yf45i8kmSzT urPqwtraHBkYNFRsB1rETw75q3so1u/QU/iBJ9YRUyfadsJxsdO5l/yJjf0doo9Xy2LB YUYg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xp6C8Pl8BnkFZdEr5FVAvbCqXGvN2Qet1hoXw8Civz8=; b=FiE2pLx4Wo2ghGxd2VmysxkRE8T3gVfWFpOMi5iJz4J3bsPwpA+oAYGY/c2kgMk7PM 5Yg8GDwGvrze0XuF4qQRKGa1svbs3iOzd58Rguo1tG7QI0CmyAw0FMw15Af6HHqeHkc6 B9RJ1/wDHHPnJI6EyFReBWAcBctF1BZiDGbGL6c5VJ+TbDeRFFPViiLK2qVvATOpCFJE ZpnZFT5n1A1ZN32FC5SvHTlOyqtVFW/3KKrAek2XnQR2Bt5oe0hopeSX3dP5uNe59nZA NcGhVrqpNiLIqNpuJFQ2GhNWAZBO93pvp/FJdoihTN5XUUVhhixC9reRoNNw+0prW9L8 g3tQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwPEGHjeb/9r5Ui6YJB3HuPUa7stzFh+EgDxVRmsrT0ePQiIi2olG633II5qs85RlVaSV+ucdjptjiZp2w== X-Received: by 10.194.189.229 with SMTP id gl5mr7364229wjc.168.1472627425586; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:10:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.19.229 with HTTP; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:10:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.19.229 with HTTP; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:10:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1e6cac8a-e1af-c9e7-a900-a2efda0771dd@gmx.de> Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 09:10:23 +0200 Message-ID: To: Dmitry Stogov Cc: "Christoph M. Becker" , PHP Internals List , Nikita Popov , David Walker Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bb709d496b7d3053b58ca4e Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC][VOTE] E_WARNING on invalid container read-adccess From: ocramius@gmail.com (Marco Pivetta) --047d7bb709d496b7d3053b58ca4e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Dmitry, On 31 Aug 2016 8:37 a.m., "Dmitry Stogov" wrote: > > I vote NO, because the implementation introduces more problems than intents to fix. > > For example the following code starts to throw exception: > > > Isn't that the point of this RFC? I would expect this code to only ever work by accident. --047d7bb709d496b7d3053b58ca4e--