Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:95440 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 15566 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2016 23:17:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 24 Aug 2016 23:17:37 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=derick@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=derick@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 82.113.146.227 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: derick@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.113.146.227 xdebug.org Received: from [82.113.146.227] ([82.113.146.227:53818] helo=xdebug.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 87/6D-10212-01B2EB75 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 19:17:37 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by xdebug.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51F2710C01C; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 00:17:34 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 00:17:34 +0100 (BST) X-X-Sender: derick@whisky.home.derickrethans.nl To: "Charles R. Portwood II" cc: PHP internals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][VOTE]: Argon2 Password Hash (Reopened) From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Thu, 25 Aug 2016, Derick Rethans wrote: > On Wed, 24 Aug 2016, Charles R. Portwood II wrote: > > > The RFC for introducing Argon2 as an alternative hashing algorithm for > > the password_* functions is now re-open. The RFC is available at > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/argon2_password_hash . > > > > Voting is open for 2 week, and will close on September 7th. A 50%+1 > > majority required to pass. If you previously voted you will need to > > vote again, as the original vote was closed shortly after opening due > > to an issue with the original RFC language. > > I'd be happy to have this, but what is the point of requiring a > ./configure flag[1] to enable this? OK - it requires a library. Ignore. cheers, Derick