Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:95278 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 47799 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2016 23:13:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 Aug 2016 23:13:02 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=cmbecker69@gmx.de; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=cmbecker69@gmx.de; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmx.de designates 212.227.15.19 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: cmbecker69@gmx.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.227.15.19 mout.gmx.net Received: from [212.227.15.19] ([212.227.15.19:62557] helo=mout.gmx.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 50/D3-23968-D7FE4B75 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 19:13:02 -0400 Received: from [192.168.2.103] ([79.243.112.54]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MKYsh-1bZsVC1Udb-001wdH; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 01:12:57 +0200 To: Stanislav Malyshev , PHP Internals References: <351c6035-2428-5296-2429-69145f7da841@gmx.de> <781c9731-0700-cfb3-f4c7-26396627f698@gmail.com> Message-ID: Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 01:13:13 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <781c9731-0700-cfb3-f4c7-26396627f698@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:CFB/v2mhiDkpzuYRkX/HSeMWYX7o80OrlrCQv6DN/v0pxHRKyH1 7qfC/5cR0I5rcm7Ws9LbLRiMyHrI2QeyFZbmv9fMXfroVe3Imf0Lx8sthKp2T7MJoQhjMYx isSpCvgthCW8V/SN5GzKcGgk1CeE/K0qv0X/QaWazs75UkSCjRhCKv5aNJUaR2k3Cv8YqMk r9VGFIKzqJmwbSudynxig== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:LX2bjyEfE20=:ZqVU4plk9a0vrwWMtu6WrA 1sQ9JddXQwaH+cQQKbn3fqFR/9yXaxiG6Kx5brHRqrEvEXD5RRaejpfI+p2sMEncrXycqdCqC 9grwDXB8jOOfTbtkNTuBh925Snz5mp+whKpEtq3USUqls+/KYYXTR/5GvJnBbR0tHwkDm2jPM gxmhqQqK15ww6VRdV3g9QymvksBu/N6z9WeXJMk7wkc59+w906q0qGVMG6Jd0p8NvqRyfyuW8 8sKx/PuAzJQP2RmrMm7KhzYwlrPF4TXIezCpqfLP1L6pcWX5Lo3BbqP0sg2uu+RZxGxsP5bSM E+0Qz2VQO9OHDf/SxbEno01HTKlF3hAvZmLGvFkyl8ohWwY1dRdnhMkHa7eN8v2gjjcJ/LG+3 OezH9rWjy0EQUq4JwxvFk+JByrXj6bLhMttZBYifM00Ns1ud96kpWszSbbxqpqAbAAVpVYAdL ed76DOfEuBSWl/VN4qy7Wtulz8tO+MSmadYElw//uqUaF34+RA2G1eGXcuLO+Gu4tndri46Ud wL2dtSL6Gel0F7jPRHxTC+3LTyILAy177pP4THoOi4oQDla+iAY4s7mtEIKx2LiNr3JPTxqbe 3xukxuNsuolfVKWMppnE7bOm3ASO/Je6FKHpw1Z+JESqvLZlKPrHaYUtr/UgeqtoahsItJPgE DiJKyPivrimTkoXSNLtG3TxS4CbM73m/SvY/+vagQDk1meeCAqppN5bgE/0L9nf4m5QVcVoTu Uce4QmJYssXKHVuhE9mEVX5Ap2hCKQYDZi+7OvRuhB6J+9JdD5vMMzs+PXJjZ44I/XpAQet7d P60Osvi Subject: Re: [RFC] orphan extensions cleanup From: cmbecker69@gmx.de ("Christoph M. Becker") Hi! On 15.08.2016 at 22:39, Stanislav Malyshev wrote: >> Maybe it would be better to first check the current status quo of >> maintainership, and after that taking care of the insufficiently >> maintained extensions. > > I think we can do both in parallel. I'll try to write the second RFC > soon (hopefully I'll have time) and we can do the maintainer list > refersh together with deciding what to do with unmaintaned extensions. Sounds good to me. If I can be of assistance, please let me know. -- Christoph M. Becker