Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:95275 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 37482 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2016 20:42:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 Aug 2016 20:42:52 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=mailing@pascal-martin.fr; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=mailing@pascal-martin.fr; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain pascal-martin.fr designates 91.121.85.26 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: mailing@pascal-martin.fr X-Host-Fingerprint: 91.121.85.26 ns362529.ip-91-121-85.eu Received: from [91.121.85.26] ([91.121.85.26:55627] helo=pascal-martin.fr) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id E8/42-23968-A4CC4B75 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 16:42:52 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.11] (home.squalenet.net [82.225.233.238]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pascal-martin.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E15ADE0204 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 22:42:47 +0200 (CEST) To: internals@lists.php.net References: Message-ID: Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 22:42:48 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][VOTE] Add session_create_id() function From: mailing@pascal-martin.fr ("Pascal MARTIN, AFUP") Le 10/08/2016 à 11:14, Yasuo Ohgaki a écrit : > Hi all, > > This is RFC for adding session_create_id() function. Hi again, Not that many of us at AFUP discussed about this RFC (maybe it's because of the summer and holidays, or it's because not many of us need this?), but those who did all agree having such a function provided by PHP will be better than trying to implement it ourselves, the day it's actually needed -- and it's a single function without much impact or bc-break anywhere else. So, we would be +1. Thanks again for your work on this! -- Pascal MARTIN, AFUP - French UG http://php-internals.afup.org/