Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:95252 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 40055 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2016 03:23:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 Aug 2016 03:23:30 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=danack@basereality.com; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=danack@basereality.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain basereality.com from 209.85.217.169 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: danack@basereality.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.217.169 mail-ua0-f169.google.com Received: from [209.85.217.169] ([209.85.217.169:33562] helo=mail-ua0-f169.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 47/73-18246-1B8D3B75 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 23:23:30 -0400 Received: by mail-ua0-f169.google.com with SMTP id 74so153662678uau.0 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 20:23:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=basereality-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=wSYj3NMn3ycsi0NgmUmLqU3h5e5ol1X4Vtp92sKzaBk=; b=fFxFTwiGpnJHa7sgK3hAeHOXaJsSbMq3brfEfJ+z371kSCGqOULs1oXKXl68UwrF70 lPW+GrksYK+qfmeOLKu7Dt31u/1jn74hxzUgrzJ8huPqhDSwGk7cmzQrMGZTMufNVp9N 9APxu0mM4muywe/r6sfCmqQUKJZ+71/CLGQz3OELsLvbKSwNS5ivsVhshqEkRZLBtJCC iZ8A4s5I8M4zQP8tDDIyuugP9g8hJgQBPgrr0PE2HPrICkE65xA71e3YQ7hoUrKnbswz +xgwHKw7P9qv3rlgWwJ4MtbJJyI9wa+CBgXqwLOBHQy43fJomWKYHANEOV+5Ibp7stUr ESIA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wSYj3NMn3ycsi0NgmUmLqU3h5e5ol1X4Vtp92sKzaBk=; b=kZGx3MVhKbMmykPd2v4nE5HfMRkHe4+NHmobhZdL2/Y6h9QEdwY6ar+ktXAJgHgi3a 1Qw7ALr5U5TnLUieUYMUiHVU2U5iIxIVX5Y5N3BY+mRBR7Bx/GmDP0EOx0SxA5asmknn /8CHRTjChKRpiacbou+hPbQoepDB3yeJ+0qX49O3QIEGZ4irMlvtyNCoQCm5ySNr0DUH zf4Ee9pdRISV2QQYciSO0qGA8jpepLkqCwOVUxw7n/Qj47gDrVFmfjszNyZ+dS9kJ/rV GblswA08QWk87RxqI9+sAj119Q5dHm4Eh2Q5s48jh44MS9WHlUzsKiZiBXT2R7bxZUVH nIQQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouulU+87DmM0y8Z2bx8LfNLrOJZ2F1YAbezhC1/2ROZXcd8yHASnwJ6dpajrUYJaEkcQFO8gTOfdmU+5Vg== X-Received: by 10.159.39.33 with SMTP id a30mr17674624uaa.33.1471404206801; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 20:23:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.176.69.4 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 20:23:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [78.144.122.219] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 04:23:25 +0100 Message-ID: To: Yasuo Ohgaki Cc: Pierre Joye , PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC][VOTE] Add validation functions to filter module From: danack@basereality.com (Dan Ackroyd) On 17 August 2016 at 01:30, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote: > I'll restart vote if I have to make changes, Yasuo, No one is asking you to make changes to the RFC. Just leave the voting open, and then close it on the agreed date. You would be violating the agreed RFC process* by closing a vote early, just so that you an resubmit a proposal straight away. https://wiki.php.net/rfc/voting Additionally, you seem to completely have ignored this: Dan Ackroyd wrote: > And I strongly object to the idea of stopping and starting voting on RFCS. Please leave the vote open and if it fails take some time to think about the feedback. It would benefit everyone if you stopped responding immediately and instead took time to actually think about what people have been saying. This RFC isn't going to be in PHP 7.1, so it is fine to wait 3 months to present a new version of the RFC. cheers Dan * "Resurrecting Rejected Proposals In order to save valuable time, it will not be allowed to bring up a rejected proposal up for another vote, unless one of the following happens: 6 months pass from the time of the previous vote, OR The author(s) make substantial changes to the proposal."