Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:95249 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 30825 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2016 00:31:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 Aug 2016 00:31:24 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=yohgaki@ohgaki.net; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=yohgaki@ohgaki.net; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain ohgaki.net designates 180.42.98.130 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: yohgaki@ohgaki.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 180.42.98.130 ns1.es-i.jp Received: from [180.42.98.130] ([180.42.98.130:34130] helo=es-i.jp) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 7D/32-18246-A50B3B75 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 20:31:24 -0400 Received: (qmail 10940 invoked by uid 89); 17 Aug 2016 00:31:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail-qt0-f177.google.com) (yohgaki@ohgaki.net@209.85.216.177) by 0 with ESMTPA; 17 Aug 2016 00:31:18 -0000 Received: by mail-qt0-f177.google.com with SMTP id u25so43141475qtb.1 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 17:31:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouuFnvtR5GsqIcP1naEHCscisHzdCeAygJ1Hfa5KF3hFIvnHlJUjHSKEc7pgw8C5qWYJvpY02KBCOcetlA== X-Received: by 10.237.49.130 with SMTP id 2mr43543734qth.38.1471393872507; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 17:31:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.85.242 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 17:30:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 09:30:31 +0900 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: To: Pierre Joye Cc: Dan Ackroyd , PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC][VOTE] Add validation functions to filter module From: yohgaki@ohgaki.net (Yasuo Ohgaki) Hi Pierre, On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 9:19 AM, Pierre Joye wrote: > On Aug 15, 2016 10:36 AM, "Yasuo Ohgaki" wrote: > >> I don't mind suspend vote for a while to resolve issues if there >> should be changes in the RFC. I also don't mind adding missing >> features, e.g. helpful error messages when exception is disabled, to >> my todo list. BTW, I'll document basic idea of secure coding and >> emphasize how it should be done, so misuse would be few. > > There is no such thing as suspended vote. The vote has to restart if there > are changes. Thank you. I'll restart vote if I have to make changes, other than more items in discussion section. Anyone would change votes if I rename functions to avoid possible confusions? There is one opinion for better names so far. It seems either "People misunderstand secure coding" and/or "People consider validation codes should be in userland fully". (Or "No more additions for filter module"?) Although I do think repetitive validations for browser's request headers/inputs in userland is awfully inefficient, efficiency is not 1st priority of security anyway. Regards, -- Yasuo Ohgaki yohgaki@ohgaki.net