Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:95088 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 41518 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2016 11:06:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Aug 2016 11:06:59 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lester@lsces.co.uk; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lester@lsces.co.uk; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lsces.co.uk from 217.147.176.230 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lester@lsces.co.uk X-Host-Fingerprint: 217.147.176.230 mail4-3.serversure.net Linux 2.6 Received: from [217.147.176.230] ([217.147.176.230:38266] helo=mail4.serversure.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id A0/0F-56950-2DDADA75 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 07:06:59 -0400 Received: (qmail 8782 invoked by uid 89); 12 Aug 2016 11:06:54 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 8772, pid: 8777, t: 0.0767s scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.96/m:52/d:10677 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.0.0.7?) (lester@rainbowdigitalmedia.org.uk@81.138.11.136) by mail4.serversure.net with ESMTPA; 12 Aug 2016 11:06:54 -0000 To: internals@lists.php.net References: <10fbcb03-5de8-4d9a-da1c-7e2bf77937cb@lsces.co.uk> <5657afc7-7569-5fc4-4a5a-27ed786c4fa5@gmail.com> <0825c173-5cb4-7f65-cf34-b45ca30919a3@lsces.co.uk> <8646c3ad-b929-cb0b-bad4-52a0a7160d16@gmail.com> <11ce571b-964b-5a3e-9f2f-3f69a8bc20b4@lsces.co.uk> <7d9db8d5-ae7a-4123-14f4-f76fb6d764c5@gmail.com> <1e14c4b9-65ce-4742-589f-19fe9290be0f@lsces.co.uk> Message-ID: <9e2c68fc-4408-a59d-9131-d869a4b88eb2@lsces.co.uk> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 12:06:53 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Simple variable handling. From: lester@lsces.co.uk (Lester Caine) On 12/08/16 11:51, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote: > What makes you feel missing some or designed badly? I may be missing something, but I thought the original code had rules for each element of the array? I would certainly expect to see the capability of setting different validating rules for each element, and the rules you are defining are the same rules that would be needed on a variable by variable basis? -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk