Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:94976 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 23946 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2016 20:13:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 Aug 2016 20:13:08 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=cmbecker69@gmx.de; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=cmbecker69@gmx.de; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmx.de designates 212.227.17.21 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: cmbecker69@gmx.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.227.17.21 mout.gmx.net Received: from [212.227.17.21] ([212.227.17.21:57850] helo=mout.gmx.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 54/67-03404-3593AA75 for ; Tue, 09 Aug 2016 16:13:08 -0400 Received: from [192.168.2.103] ([217.82.227.154]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M2XkX-1bHCVm3XM5-00sMch; Tue, 09 Aug 2016 22:13:04 +0200 To: Davey Shafik , Leigh References: Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" Message-ID: <5c578ad4-c2c6-5b95-34ab-913efcfb38c9@gmx.de> Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 22:13:05 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:+IkIFAT+1jQjFkWLQMkOWkGtPXWzeXkg4SF31uy0QlVgXOkwcQB V40JmQG5ZLlBJ6HJlDYCUZKPzvLKEpPU3w+sFeSuRwclGZrGYL4jA+WXYZgeEJRV8Kte8RV 53XyQmMZBba3XnggXKjWJlb8jGV8T/CsXvJrkqDVL9+KeAvM/ZapTLgxifiugPUPssKJldy EhL0tA76E3q3nau1NJ2BQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:mbYVx/aIZ64=:oNA1FCNDy/XxJOft/Zrr7Q 8J6iilMQZLZinrRCi1YTIZOFH0aI/OcNzGBC0U8y6Summjlaj1i5R4VghD/4Wfh9Omp+arMAm WOp2nRaT5k9v/2xEXapu8sPeqyL6nT3Wqd/DpG/6uUaMbsT62QfNV8qSFGg53UCBqGGVE8dPP S2Jc5IdA7JEu3n7dnpHGkBQF3mAvlaR17JwthxJPFPh8Gpkv8pnnUpucEtpbMUyUkSLKZnWvg V+TGwvlVJ6e/4aVrRjMR0u3aoXvflQWq+Ar2gD0b+4KvXok2wk5jhn+WvtjEuFV8bNE744a+d BfWkfxC9whirCDSgAw+wjJuq1UHGCYhVLGgWVt6fjQ7pwY0xjnN9x8aaCBGNhYJh1uKw10plw +HXWODGaqSMh1vtudWdfM5uopCmYzygGCYCjel90j2CNhTu9djUUpQQl4xJFgQxx06s7ZuwPn hAnR4rWI8H9yP+/YjdsN29YHyo1nf6PC86sBApvF1aPXI/5TIX/YbkscgYEmrypj/6STF1Jcs EK56i8BeZZiPhh4acO9ulzBHYfG7LO3lYEhD8lmtj1Kj2JVFPLoxHSIJZOjF3RK9tPGA9h/Ib 75HYAklFYXT2T4S+ibVsnIxIofCz/+Tp8slVfvscUs+auzjUCEYNy3FkTSWRTGzkAKizrOpzv YgxdpiymNvvP5RDYgnZB+yXH5l+VPAALXj3zIKofDFyV5H92+ylgEUnWSSRcOTsR+X4trzN4z hl7vP/1EYUZlCwrT7/VB0goIIbp5u89kFYXCHOGG6K6w7jpiV6cawbpSAL8XE2an0KOGqh147 bHAdwpy Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] BC break with rand() where min > max From: cmbecker69@gmx.de ("Christoph M. Becker") On 09.08.2016 at 00:12, Davey Shafik wrote: > I would _very_ much prefer to keep this BC. If we do the right thing, and > there are no repercussions, I'd actually remove the warning. Well, there is already . > If you think > we might want to disallow this in the future, use an E_DEPRECATED, but a > warning seems pointless unless it's doing the wrong thing, or it's going to > start doing the wrong thing at some point. +1 -- Christoph M. Becker