Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:94934 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 89068 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2016 15:45:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 8 Aug 2016 15:45:08 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=cmbecker69@gmx.de; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=cmbecker69@gmx.de; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmx.de designates 212.227.15.18 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: cmbecker69@gmx.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.227.15.18 mout.gmx.net Received: from [212.227.15.18] ([212.227.15.18:57795] helo=mout.gmx.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 10/42-33134-309A8A75 for ; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 11:45:07 -0400 Received: from [192.168.2.103] ([217.82.227.154]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MSv6D-1bgzyk379p-00RoTy; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 17:44:47 +0200 To: Yasuo Ohgaki , "internals@lists.php.net" References: Message-ID: <94f3f9b0-fe81-3007-c91f-46d445340807@gmx.de> Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 17:44:57 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:K0UJHcIN6TnKkio5PDqDaV2e3375pr8lJcvHKp5eeh8Yu58VnTq mNWdLd+eUeFJnm4EarQmNQR5fUynd29TGdQ2FocLesoUqgOKMtsvpQzkwIYbii66CCPdwUC nFWCH6xKWh9nCi7Nnr74kG2KHomOWT3zOgxfRFwQiccnPNG/UpeUb9ArEnFc1IsI/V/PrHX V6mvT1QEIs/v7N5lkuImQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:MYtHJhZXeZ0=:pqRRWvEVB/W4wUZqx/GQqD XD7xti9pRhnWO2rY3NnVxcnCbk3IjaryjSNxtDXt1iRoPQVJt8yPyhq8PxOQkmlztYgbgxoC7 cgeMeV6czVjrSukF6ilTbFWG3b6Y396he2Le/dXmOlvzR0sEKuocF7Rzgs9l50Ki/NmKL2x7N h2j6QOiqaJzYUm7a5qAUM6AFnfSNOA7YDfWxrKY78Y1DaziciClyRPzAmYERm1OGVNsx59ShC vFAnN7IgigFk3SdaoQG3QXCrnmhLgzeajsgb3u2DgzVTlGYcuo6n8Cem995GyXi8V/dOnDygu fPjPfVqX5siDhDv9eJlIJQa4SojtRDiCGXKzQRr7+MiBVGJhRqetr5JAYr501cA83gGg3hno9 Jxf55PC1qtJ3Ma40diaFRp1kpp2+VnubY5i2T1362ETB85HyI9WmMfCjA4LqYfsngugCRQaLV H8CsyWADTB7+AqFChl6TPZo7UMnhn/gceBbl/Q4PKoB/2W9CG4qljDpZsDMe6bJmOVAUDN3fn I0PThGuUyo1OcIkScOqYxxR5zWUgpDAmzXMcnv8xOyFSJsWEQfy4r7tmtS2d+9o5oXzX/3ugM va1i2367+vRBXr2ez3HciRFEL/Le1raAJM5Uj3VlBVEquakz3/5OMSz4zlpFd6D1qhHLlj1LU 7OwHAPlANjagmJKH76BbNT5zMkJSN0BjjOIcVg9IqTq3wI0qajvRIhZldy29eWVTsNnMH71Qp UbFt3hasSToQXA6E36fgME+c4Vv2gpLzOgC5SHzkwsemCiQpCl4tY+cPQF90+JFdL0sshOGOP wdzJyM9 Subject: Re: [RFC][VOTE] Session ID without hashing - Vote reopened and restarted From: cmbecker69@gmx.de ("Christoph M. Becker") Hi Yasuo! On 25.07.2016 at 11:49, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote: > Due to defects in the RFC, vote is reopened and restarted. > Followings are changes from 1st vote. > > […] > > Vote ends 2016/08/02 23:59:59 UTC. I've just noticed that the voting is still open, although it's already 2016-08-08. Shouldn't it be closed? -- Christoph M. Becker