Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:94894
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain mindplay.dk from 209.85.213.46 cause and error)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAEDdnaXH-PuRawcXUuS_pSH8jwVsH=0MLCvnfHJVsUVEwTz0AA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAEDdnaXH-PuRawcXUuS_pSH8jwVsH=0MLCvnfHJVsUVEwTz0AA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 13:06:26 +0200
Message-ID: <CADqTB_jj6kK0V=W6zMmGEhoMqvKfs_AMGp6AjTcG_pAUuEsy3A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Vostrikov <michael.vostrikov@gmail.com>
Cc: PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113d9cec7a51280539794a65
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][VOTE] New operator (short tag) for
 context-dependent escaping
From: rasmus@mindplay.dk (Rasmus Schultz)

--001a113d9cec7a51280539794a65
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Looks like it's unanimously a No.

Michael, don't be discouraged - I think that everyone agrees that there is
a problem to be solved, it's just that no one except you thinks this is a
good solution; many of us are of the opinion that it's not a solution that
really addresses the problem at all: you haven't eliminated the choice of
whether or how to escape something, you've merely changed the scope of that
choice - into global state, which clearly isn't popular.

I encourage you to keep thinking about this problem, but you should explore
entirely different directions - rethink and rephrase the problem, get to
the core of it, and a different angle on the problem might reveal itself.


On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 5:09 PM, Michael Vostrikov <
michael.vostrikov@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello. The RFC 'New operator (short tag) for context-dependent escaping' is
> now in voting phase.
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/escaping_operator
>
> This RFC introduces new short tag/operator, which will perform echo with an
> automatic call of escaping function.
> Voting is open till August 6, but it can be prolongated if you will decide
> that this is too small voting time for such a change.
> Voting requires 2/3 support.
>
> Thank you for voting.
>

--001a113d9cec7a51280539794a65--