Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:94774 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 23008 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2016 09:03:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Aug 2016 09:03:41 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=dave@mudsite.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=dave@mudsite.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain mudsite.com designates 209.85.214.53 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: dave@mudsite.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.214.53 mail-it0-f53.google.com Received: from [209.85.214.53] ([209.85.214.53:37698] helo=mail-it0-f53.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 98/11-15377-C601F975 for ; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 05:03:40 -0400 Received: by mail-it0-f53.google.com with SMTP id f6so163227556ith.0 for ; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 02:03:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mudsite-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=PmW1+f94xMmeFRehd4EKf7h67Ya4TzmtbAYc9DMtGZk=; b=mdtN5NErx8FGugrkcc30gPfZRLp+6Qd6XhTNj8KH2V7paSbySFHKw722xE76AcIHW4 7rW6hGZONpfQIQXOKS82y2sBjTaQo2aYJZhkMqSPDu3oMxC2ERPgpuq1PexZFHIoKIB6 KHv/59czuR4PxzoJhx7WZUlwnCcKRnvdsmAYntbm7XA8surMRcnX5C/ja07DqJjBUD0j CKJgRnSjjqkV69SvWnuOznKzqVM5U0otpELs6BsQuWcx4iG6INeWsluTJymCZqxY66HF AvHdhkOYvLbwiENYwLS7dV64X9BFM4Sf0bxY5zZ41khayR8Ja+iiQ+rYnQB/TV+vkF/q +h5w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=PmW1+f94xMmeFRehd4EKf7h67Ya4TzmtbAYc9DMtGZk=; b=etwP6l9pcuD64eInwnyVkbMBjVt9dCl2cw7LQlH4S9U8Sq0DtiVQi2A9m5uKYpch1B onDGj5vtrc9XQaEUBDuFaf2OqSG3dcg1/xTl54KdaSyZ5yT6uuWAji88AjXSxqiGYzfU JI/D2LnEgiw/u10wjHtFVpC35uh/KksiQKqOCuZktVuaXMsxmL2Nmb3hc1QTI1YcaQLF 0VKuBNekkgjl/Hla+QEf+SPHUnO1StvLvnbyUox4RzrlKYnsuI1pdUqlPiVogwwWF3nT IoX+ic56OXEbi6jNDYDDkFNIvZfSAyzTtNjRMNPFuTl9YTIfrcTZNtIvf5szFo6UiRhu fk/Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouuEK/Z2pJJhzrWq3qKLYiC/Q5dRIz+pwNEIJH7sgxHyYIgST/EcaehRU+KzNJQSgFsjSlsz25UKHcvjfg== X-Received: by 10.36.163.71 with SMTP id p68mr41484777ite.50.1470042217568; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 02:03:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 09:03:27 +0000 Message-ID: To: Dan Ackroyd Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c049e922f39ff0538fee05b Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] E_NOTICE for invalid array container From: dave@mudsite.com (David Walker) --94eb2c049e922f39ff0538fee05b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Dan, I left it blank to go along with default production ini-settings where notices would be excluded. However, you are probably correct that it should be noted for development environments as something new. I'll toss it in there in the morning Thanks -- Dave On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 01:14 Dan Ackroyd wrote: > Hi David, > > On 31 July 2016 at 20:31, David Walker wrote: > > So I want to solicit for more discussion given previous talks. My > > first-attempt RFC for this is at: > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/notice-for-non-valid-array-container > > > > I've very likely to support this RFC, however the section on 'Backward > Incompatible Changes' needs to be filled out, as this RFC would make > code that currently emits no notices, start emitting notices. > > cheers > Dan > --94eb2c049e922f39ff0538fee05b--