Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:94698 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 77948 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2016 08:29:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Jul 2016 08:29:48 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=cmbecker69@gmx.de; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=cmbecker69@gmx.de; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmx.de designates 212.227.15.19 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: cmbecker69@gmx.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.227.15.19 mout.gmx.net Received: from [212.227.15.19] ([212.227.15.19:64086] helo=mout.gmx.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id A0/52-61920-CFDC5975 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 04:29:48 -0400 Received: from [192.168.2.103] ([217.82.227.154]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lvl0u-1bFKfL0A7Y-017UcS; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 10:29:43 +0200 To: Davey Shafik , Anatol Belski References: <37ae91bd-6f07-c14b-faeb-b7ba246c43db@gmx.de> <029001d1e641$c359f3d0$4a0ddb70$@belski.net> Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" , Ferenc Kovacs Message-ID: Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 10:29:53 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:crSlX4fP52igvM+ma8PzWcVcn3nqokQgnkskye5UvFK29EqDPGp lxsvSKkGzW1962dZ6m6RDuuSy3QkVi/86a7Og0X1jWp8NvLPjs5hrD4ciYVkBo9hYJ/vzAB cVwvkpzLlGBSTeldtDK3CPif5a/E81jwgkHMnuOINc7ECtvTCyEG859O8H0hf55j2WL3INx VkDYAkBiWDAlAIEBx7ZuA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:Vcr+coKL320=:30LSxB1TlbBnY+5/XV6BiE mcEKldjJr/JIyQmpylQk3kL04dHs3IV/Q7hIbuZ/uIzqGOKgbOb3KzwJCBksX9JJwNinQz0FZ ir6JWmToAWZbRMgjCoKoTZDBFt49a2piz1p1mtFDpZ3CpmJW8sTTt03rpsH3903jjCzhQ9smt ABy+cZRBm5JQvUNhpDleCEsUGnGyXyafAobXZTvxU5B8mrj4RUxvWii9l5RKP51IfK87JF/Tq VvdQYrjHszVbgYVHEl0IKRkvSYDfnGciAow0LSAB8vnFPXcgE41/CzNtjT204AvJqGKHbz2tA d/UE9pjrWjFm6WhP1kgqEneGNHhR7qm3r7SWSSbvReWYGd4BwmlOODLt1S04Z81lS9sOkns+3 C355I47Zv62IzVA/RaYc7To9FJ+p1hezbnPgdXbH64RxRLkYYW2YMiTLAoatbhLWLP5GDydm0 RA8XuKoi9o7Mp8T9ZOrqydnRYFZlnMOBY8Xf4AlctU5MrQkaTcJfXTrgNtNU8Sub8+IL6pKzV Chj3PTfF7L/v6Zf+wKzappUlW9K3/zcp6TbQzkrP5C5ti4Ue65ywBanWjKOh6QcGVSgJJmMHN LgnfwHLtxw1W2btQIooIKKR6VRmUnwTpLWa3+De/QfZZCqg73uTS92BKpIlHnIIyvlXlMLuaC 5rvWYS44qFmDFlN5iM4J3W2qI3PaRZHnqlTKS1MGCmyb+9tDr/Pq1B9Hxm3LhvcRp2hUvDiSz nUq4W9HVTJVVmxztbqmHWOHHmAw0xwsh3IG/06atPOZtRhZiE10m2I/da3KcOPG3CIcuq2/25 wJwLz6i Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Bundled SQLlite3 From: cmbecker69@gmx.de (Christoph Becker) On 25.07.2016 at 09:11, Davey Shafik wrote: > I'd like to see an updated SQLite in 7.1, this is part of shoring up the > stability of the release IMO. Thanks, Anatol and Davey for the fast reply. After having a closer look at the release news, it seems that there have been no major bugs in 3.8.10.2, and that release is not so old (2015-05-20), so I leave 5.6 and 7.0 as is. 7.1 and master should, however, be fixed (i.e. update of sqlite3.h and sqlite3ext.h to 3.13.0). Done with . I'll try to keep an eye on SQLite3 wrt. new releases and possibly necessary updates in PHP. > On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 11:57 PM, Anatol Belski > wrote: > >> Hi Christoph, >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Christoph Becker [mailto:cmbecker69@gmx.de] >>> Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 12:49 AM >>> To: internals@lists.php.net >>> Subject: [PHP-DEV] Bundled SQLlite3 >>> >>> Hi! >>> >>> What's our stance on updating the bundled SQLite3? >>> >>> Currently the PHP-5.6 and 7.0 branch have 3.8.10.2, while the PHP-7.1 and >>> master branch have 3.9.2 (sqlite3.h) respectively 3.13.0 (sqlite3.c). >> The latter >>> would have certainly to be fixed to be consistent, but I have some doubts >>> regarding sticking with old SQLite3 versions for supported PHP >> versions. After all, >>> all minor versions at least as of SQLite 3.9.0 are "regularly scheduled >>> maintenance releases"[1], and it appears that no bug-fixes will be >> published for >>> non-current minor versions. >>> >> Normally it is ok to upgrade the bundled libsqlite. When done carefully, >> even in the stable branch. Fe from the news you've linked - "Yikes! The >> 3.12.0 and 3.12.1 releases contain a backwards compatibility bug!" :) But >> similar situations already happened before. However not upgrading it at all >> for 3 years is also not good, so fine with upgrading it from time to time. >> A respective RM should be better asked for approval. >> >> Regards >> >> Anatol -- Christoph M. Becker