Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:94663
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.218.41 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAEZPtU606bCOjLh-zTLYHraWiWPAPHSjFRCS9LOjvCDF103boQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGa2bXaSkozJLLtycujwmHyas9TofRw5s6JzG0EQQvPyU0pxNQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGa2bXYLuxq2Yywr_v4B5ExQ37bWE9Fc45KLNCcXVQS3d47_kA@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.20.1607121124450.16349@whisky.home.derickrethans.nl>
	<CAGa2bXYF7y6ZefKqaxVkdmYtXpoZPU3doAguOC_recGrQ4Fr2Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<86246bad-5290-8ad7-be48-1d981d720182@gmail.com>
	<4b53c180-40bf-7b11-6d6f-2d68eee7cf54@gmail.com>
	<CANaX5nehCTXsO3Vg5Zsipn8Dx0gmGo=9XB0SJ79KKt-w172MNw@mail.gmail.com>
	<d540d36e-c52b-d125-eccb-b8de7e384bc4@gmail.com>
	<CAGa2bXbsXz_ft=9j_NvegK=Qs2W02_DWsEcLLJi_3M_g2sQTyg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEZPtU7Y4=6Liqow=LmJBx8MqC8Vo2hpeGXXCLNZhymgRkq1uQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEZPtU5cxM7DbiUR_4SvvEmeAkwPOQrJAVTOu8QH_=cMfHPe4A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEZPtU64h+veY-tevLb269zyQG4h==X1BKmHyKuwTDbkjk6FSg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEZPtU606bCOjLh-zTLYHraWiWPAPHSjFRCS9LOjvCDF103boQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2016 11:12:29 +0700
Message-ID: <CAEZPtU5z81FCRHgy_XgZUprOWH_G=O+b2F+txkAKLBM-XbF6+A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Yasuo Ohgaki <yohgaki@ohgaki.net>
Cc: Davey Shafik <davey@php.net>, PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>, 
	Derick Rethans <derick@php.net>, Stanislav Malyshev <smalyshev@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113d40be4dccda053859e037
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC][VOTE] Session ID without hashing
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

--001a113d40be4dccda053859e037
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi Yasuo,

On Jul 24, 2016 10:51 AM, "Yasuo Ohgaki" <yohgaki@ohgaki.net> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 6:13 AM, Stanislav Malyshev <smalyshev@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >> Changing the RFC during voting requires a _restart_ not an extension.
> >> The vote must be re-run. I will not put this in 7.1 without a new vote.
> >
> > OK, looks like I was underestimating the magnitude of the messiness that
> > this change (or lack of it) brought to a vote. Let's re-run the vote
> > then, I think that would be the best solution given the confusion that
> > apparently happened.
>
> I'll open reopen the vote a week.
> Is this too long?
>

No it is not. Sadly I did not follow up on that when I said the vote should
start again.

The idea of a minimum voting period is not an option but a must. We
introduced it in the relase process rfc, as well as the minimum discussion
time, to be sure everyone has a chance to voice out and vote.

We have been a bit too tolerant lately  (like "as this is a small change I
only setup one week discussion"). This must not happen. It is not about the
content of a rfc but the time available for contributors to act. And all
contributors do not follow the RFCs daily.

Cheers
Pierre

--001a113d40be4dccda053859e037--