Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:94662 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 60461 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2016 03:51:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 24 Jul 2016 03:51:47 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=yohgaki@ohgaki.net; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=yohgaki@ohgaki.net; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain ohgaki.net designates 180.42.98.130 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: yohgaki@ohgaki.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 180.42.98.130 ns1.es-i.jp Received: from [180.42.98.130] ([180.42.98.130:37242] helo=es-i.jp) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id A7/38-05797-15B34975 for ; Sat, 23 Jul 2016 23:51:46 -0400 Received: (qmail 50788 invoked by uid 89); 24 Jul 2016 03:51:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail-qk0-f169.google.com) (yohgaki@ohgaki.net@209.85.220.169) by 0 with ESMTPA; 24 Jul 2016 03:51:41 -0000 Received: by mail-qk0-f169.google.com with SMTP id x1so131974578qkb.3 for ; Sat, 23 Jul 2016 20:51:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoous1nrTjZ5WK9KEz0HbN1zYFc9WDCyZ7Yiccq2+cejB7bOzJq5GKxT7HpMnqOzyrrONohs06LNu4unYSGA== X-Received: by 10.55.146.2 with SMTP id u2mr15285715qkd.20.1469332292702; Sat, 23 Jul 2016 20:51:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.85.242 with HTTP; Sat, 23 Jul 2016 20:50:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <86246bad-5290-8ad7-be48-1d981d720182@gmail.com> <4b53c180-40bf-7b11-6d6f-2d68eee7cf54@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2016 12:50:52 +0900 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: To: Stanislav Malyshev Cc: Davey Shafik , Derick Rethans , "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC][VOTE] Session ID without hashing From: yohgaki@ohgaki.net (Yasuo Ohgaki) Hi all, On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 6:13 AM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote: >> Changing the RFC during voting requires a _restart_ not an extension. >> The vote must be re-run. I will not put this in 7.1 without a new vote. > > OK, looks like I was underestimating the magnitude of the messiness that > this change (or lack of it) brought to a vote. Let's re-run the vote > then, I think that would be the best solution given the confusion that > apparently happened. I'll open reopen the vote a week. Is this too long? Regards, -- Yasuo Ohgaki yohgaki@ohgaki.net