Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:94654
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.218.44 as permitted sender)
To: Yasuo Ohgaki <yohgaki@ohgaki.net>, Derick Rethans <derick@php.net>
References: <CAGa2bXaSkozJLLtycujwmHyas9TofRw5s6JzG0EQQvPyU0pxNQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGa2bXYLuxq2Yywr_v4B5ExQ37bWE9Fc45KLNCcXVQS3d47_kA@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1607121124450.16349@whisky.home.derickrethans.nl>
 <CAGa2bXYF7y6ZefKqaxVkdmYtXpoZPU3doAguOC_recGrQ4Fr2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Message-ID: <86246bad-5290-8ad7-be48-1d981d720182@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2016 12:46:14 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:45.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAGa2bXYF7y6ZefKqaxVkdmYtXpoZPU3doAguOC_recGrQ4Fr2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC][VOTE] Session ID without hashing
From: smalyshev@gmail.com (Stanislav Malyshev)

Hi!

> I missed to remove the related lines in RFC. I marked the line by <del>.
> I don't mind reopen the vote few days. Any objections?
> If no objections, I'll reopen vote few days.

We already had a vote, at it was completed. Having another vote on the
same subject, slightly modified, is highly irregular and contrary to
voting RFC, which mandates 6 month period or *substantial* changes (with
assumed new discussion period I imagine, since past discussion can't
really count for substantially changed proposal) to schedule a new vote
on a rejected proposal.

This also gives pretty bad example - on failed vote, tweak a little
issue and issue immediate revote, repeat until one of the votes
succeeds. I understand that this is not at all your intent here, but
it's the pattern that we do not want to enable.

I voted yes for it, and it is a pity that it failed, as it seems,
because of a miscommunication (maybe not, I don't know), but going
against our own agreed process I think is not a good outcome either.
-- 
Stas Malyshev
smalyshev@gmail.com