Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:94599 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 6985 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2016 23:43:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Jul 2016 23:43:02 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=php@golemon.com; sender-id=softfail Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=php@golemon.com; spf=softfail; sender-id=softfail Received-SPF: softfail (pb1.pair.com: domain golemon.com does not designate 209.85.223.179 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: php@golemon.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.223.179 mail-io0-f179.google.com Received: from [209.85.223.179] ([209.85.223.179:34780] helo=mail-io0-f179.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 84/E5-52781-38C00975 for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 19:43:00 -0400 Received: by mail-io0-f179.google.com with SMTP id q83so61837404iod.1 for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 16:42:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=golemon-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=5cCMdzIJR3UfaEvjZcrSblaAkC1gMtkdlgwkhmd+5ZY=; b=buSUWcwdlrvB0GEQvfOvrZO9pWUr3liGWq1IbmdXgj9ELif1FxtPqzqX5KoCCafjYY 8l2WGUTa4sYPhQmi3vR5R3XXk+zhoNquGhH84xn5x6NlDLcbAm6CWUSZrEhdVDwrV02r EtRR/3Q1EBhhWx6Ai0rmQ3teYh7bSV8n6qp7+Eth8t3YNchUGfhrW5Zq0eSTKM/B7O3u Hwag/iieQYNMFp0genMG/nhnP0U7t7gAX05n3luC7dipIcEKT71zRNB3tRiGbHB7zysG S0a+Co5MtipqsDjAdNXaAmoOjYDvRnXZ39B2XVUgKGp2UA+eCzyY8DUPLOWPWccFM6Qr c1GQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject :to; bh=5cCMdzIJR3UfaEvjZcrSblaAkC1gMtkdlgwkhmd+5ZY=; b=ea5iPgpf7tIDTm/LXy59iRhO9et8vUh0ELJ9qTN6hAxmM0CXElZv0cfaxIOjs6EOVn 1IQl4rcl9u7YOf42rEKaK/epQ0MjylSNfB5ar5CHZCn+uWUu418nangbYlQs5VqlcUM4 NR8smfmK3xHZEcq//EtfIWDT0AihF2Z8ksFkfltwIukvHpo88813padRSUX2ZncXm4K3 BD1MmHYH1rrIG8X9coNUxKzYcPS8lKf5WMzST1X/ZhcUMHAlXTYB2T4jAQghFbHx8YPo t0RkD+Dh1ueRoKATPk9kn3233uhs3Od0IBv7c0xW6aEytfZn0S2HQv+qlSK21q2I6Tm8 BWAw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLaOCpw/xoqN2al8jrSwaPxHcips3H/nKvA4M/HP/30LPESn9N//tQas0kkcFSoeQ0YJQRhEQEW2QHTPg== X-Received: by 10.107.4.198 with SMTP id 189mr11313114ioe.143.1469058177004; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 16:42:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: php@golemon.com Received: by 10.36.117.201 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 16:42:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [107.198.91.68] Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 17:42:56 -0600 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4z-AWdQCBKmiqEgmRFIW0qVXbJw Message-ID: To: PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Pipe Operator v2 From: pollita@php.net (Sara Golemon) With the branching of 7.1, and after some reflection on the previous feedback, I'd like to reopen discussion of the Pipe Operator RFC https://wiki.php.net/rfc/pipe-operator which I had previously put on hold. I've changed much of the argument wording of the proposal, but not the substantive feature set. If you still feel it's unworkable, I'd like to encourage you to respond with what you think would make it workable (if anything). Thanks. -Sara